AI, Analytics & Content Strategy: Andy Crestodina on the Future of Digital Marketing

AI, Analytics & Content Strategy: Andy Crestodina on the Future of Digital Marketing written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

Listen to the full episode: Overview In this episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast, John Jantsch welcomes Andy Crestodina, co-founder and CMO of Orbit Media Studios, to explore the rapidly changing world of digital marketing. Andy shares practical insights on using AI for content strategy, analytics, and website optimization—while emphasizing the enduring importance of […]

Helping Stakeholders Help Themselves written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

Listen to the full episode:

Overview

In this episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast, John Jantsch talks with Bill Shander, information designer, data communications expert, and founder of Beehive Media. Bill shares insights from his new book, “Stakeholder Whispering: Uncover What People Need Before Doing What They Ask.” The conversation covers how to turn complex data into clear, actionable stories, the importance of questioning order-taking, and why active listening and genuine curiosity are the keys to building trust and delivering what stakeholders truly need. Listeners will learn practical strategies for stakeholder engagement, leadership, and data-driven decision-making in the age of AI.

About the Guest

Bill Shander is a data communications expert, information designer, and founder of Beehive Media. With over 25 years of experience, he has helped leading organizations—including the United Nations, World Bank, and Deloitte—turn complex ideas into clear, actionable stories. Bill is a recognized thought leader in data visualization, storytelling, and stakeholder engagement, and is the author of “Stakeholder Whispering: Uncover What People Need Before Doing What They Ask.”

Actionable Insights

  • Data storytelling is about communicating meaning and insight, not just sharing numbers and reports.
  • Order-taking leads to missed opportunities; real value comes from questioning, listening, and guiding stakeholders to what they truly need.
  • Active listening, curiosity, and asking better questions are essential for building trust and uncovering stakeholders’ real objectives.
  • Silence is a powerful tool for reflection and better conversation—embrace the pause to allow deeper thinking.
  • Stakeholder engagement applies to all roles, not just marketing—including HR, IT, and leadership.
  • Recognize and prioritize all stakeholders—sometimes the real goals and needs come from several layers up in the organization.
  • In hybrid and remote work environments, intentional communication and Socratic questioning are even more important.
  • Organizational culture and leadership openness determine how effective “stakeholder whispering” can be—seek or build a culture that values questioning and strategic thinking.

Great Moments (with Timestamps)

  • 00:45 – What is a Data Communication Expert?
    Bill explains the importance of storytelling and visualization in making data meaningful.
  • 01:44 – Why Stakeholder Whispering Matters More Than Ever
    Why questioning and guiding stakeholders is critical in the age of AI and short attention spans.
  • 04:28 – Beyond Order-Taking: Leading with Questions
    Bill shares why challenging requests and using a consultative approach delivers better results.
  • 07:41 – The Power of Active Listening and Curiosity
    Tips for asking better questions and truly hearing stakeholders’ needs.
  • 09:16 – Silence is Golden
    The value of pausing, reflection, and pacing in communication and presentations.
  • 10:28 – Common Pitfalls: Mistaking Tasks for Outcomes
    Why focusing only on what’s requested misses the real goals.
  • 12:58 – Recognizing the Real Stakeholders
    How to identify and prioritize who really matters in any project or initiative.
  • 15:13 – Culture, Leadership, and Whisperability
    The role of culture and leadership in fostering open, strategic conversations.
  • 17:01 – Adapting Stakeholder Engagement to Hybrid and Remote Work
    Why face-to-face or Socratic dialogue is essential for discovering true needs.
  • 18:58 – Real-World Example: The Power of Questioning Assumptions
    Bill tells a client story where open-ended questioning led to a far better outcome.

Pulled Quotes

“Our job is not just to execute tasks—it’s to succeed and help our organization succeed. That means probing, questioning, and challenging the status quo.”
— Bill Shander

“Active listening, curiosity, and asking the right questions are what build trust and uncover what stakeholders really need.”
— Bill Shander

John Jantsch (00:00.878)

Hello and welcome to another episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast. This is John Jantsch and my guest today is Bill Shander. He’s a data communications expert, information designer and founder of Beehive Media. Over 25 years of experience, Bill has helped leading organizations, including United Nations, World Bank and Deloitte turn complex ideas into clear, actionable stories. We’re going to talk about his latest book today, Stakeholder Whispering, Uncover What People Need.

before doing what they ask. So Bill, welcome to the show.

Bill Shander (00:34.34)

Thank you, John. I’m really happy to be here.

John Jantsch (00:36.736)

So I just, sometimes people have things in their bios that I have to ask about. So what does a data communication expert do?

Bill Shander (00:45.654)

That’s a good question. So, you know, everybody these days has data, whether it’s your sales data, your marketing data, your HR data, everybody has data. We’re always packaging it up in PowerPoint presentations to present to our bosses or reports for the board or whoever. And people don’t really do a very good job of it either because they’re not really thinking about communicating ideas. They’re worried about shoving numbers at people. And so I help people.

John Jantsch (01:09.314)

Yeah. Right.

Bill Shander (01:12.216)

tell stories of data, as well as visualize that data in an impactful way.

John Jantsch (01:16.462)

Yeah. And I think there’s probably a lot of people, myself included, that I want to hear the story. Like, what does this data mean? you know, rather than just saying, look, we got this much traffic. Okay. Is that good? Is that bad? Yeah. So what inspired you to write the book? I mean, is there, is there something going on today, you know, in the business world that you think it makes this idea more critical?

Bill Shander (01:22.553)

Yeah.

Bill Shander (01:29.014)

Exactly. How many clicks is good? Are clicks even useful? We don’t know.

Bill Shander (01:44.378)

That’s a good question. I don’t know if today it’s more critical in that this has always been an issue, honestly. I’ve been looking at it for 30 years and took me a long time to realize that this is the thing. Like I’ve been thinking about doing a book for a long time and this was finally the idea of the nugget that said, yes, this must be done. It’s been an issue that’s been around forever. Is it more important today than ever? I would say maybe possibly because of AI. mean, okay, we’re already talking about AI, know, it’s 2025, of course you have to, but.

Honestly, when you ask AI to do something, it just does it. AI is an order taker. And we as humans, what can we do better than AI today? Maybe we can still discern, what really should be done? And maybe we can ask good follow-up questions on all the kinds of things that I talk about in the book that we have to do in order to make sure we’re delivering against the right tasks. AI is just going to do it. So it’s even more important for that reason.

John Jantsch (02:19.064)

Yeah. Yeah.

John Jantsch (02:38.198)

Yeah. You know, it’s interesting. mean, I think you can make a case for being more important today and in some ways, because what you mentioned AI actually allows us to crunch a lot more data than we ever would have been able to in some cases. so we certainly have that even the smallest of companies have access now to big crunching. But I think also, I noticed a lot of people, stakeholders included, you know, have much shorter attention spans. And so,

Bill Shander (02:57.082)

Yeah.

John Jantsch (03:04.258)

You know, that 27 page PowerPoint deck, you know, can be condensed into a story or a metaphor. You know, that might actually be a better way to present the information.

Bill Shander (03:15.748)

Well, that’s it. so stakeholder whispering is, you the basic idea is your stakeholders ask you to do things based on their automated response. How do we usually do it? Well, usually we put it to 27 page PowerPoint deck together. And the problem is to what you said, you know, first of all, attention spans are shrinking a hundred other reasons why that may not be the best solution. But on top of that, like,

I mean, they don’t even know what they need. They’re just going to go with the automated response. And so our job as workers, and it doesn’t matter what role you’re in, if it’s marketing, great, but HR people need this, IT people, finance, et cetera. Whatever we’re working on, we need to question the ask, know, question that automated response. Maybe it is a PowerPoint deck that’s needed, or maybe not to your point.

John Jantsch (04:03.928)

So you mentioned the word order taking, know, I actually, ironically, somebody just said this to me the other day. We have to, you know, we have to sell them what they want so that we can get the trust to sell them what they need. You’ve probably heard that before and you’re kind of advocating for the idea that, no, we need to lead them to what they need and not, you know, and maybe use numbers to help do that. Talk a little more about that idea of beyond order taking.

Bill Shander (04:15.502)

Yeah. Yeah.

Bill Shander (04:28.738)

Yeah. And what you just said is also true, right? Like you do have to gain trust before you can lead them effectively. But yes, the fact is our stakeholders don’t know what they need and our job is to guide them. I often say it’s like therapy. I have a whole chapter in the book about how to conduct a therapy session because it is very much like therapy. Someone comes to a therapist because they have an issue and they need help. And the therapist doesn’t tell them what to do.

They ask them questions. say, well, how does that make you feel? Right? And the questions, right. And the questions allow you to look inside yourself and say, wait, yeah. How does that make me feel? And so in work, okay, you know, we’re launching a new product marketing, make us a brochure. Okay. You know, why would a brochure be better than an app or better than this, that, or the other? Huh? Yeah. Maybe, maybe we should do an app. that introspective opportunity is what guides us down the road towards maybe another option.

John Jantsch (04:56.406)

Yeah. Why do we want that?

Bill Shander (05:24.634)

you know, when you’re new, like you’re in a new role, new boss, whatever, you haven’t gained that trust yet, maybe all you do is you try one thing, one question, which is, the question could be, how do we measure success? How are we gonna know this is gonna, when this has worked, how are we gonna measure that? And just that one question, it’s not gonna get them all the way to some new way of thinking maybe.

but it’s an initial ask. It’s at least one step beyond overtaking. And then over time, you’ll gain more trust and you’ll be able to sort of expand on that guidance way of thinking about it.

John Jantsch (05:58.144)

You know, what I have found is, is that’s a, that’s an incredible technique in selling. you know, a lot of times people will come to us and say, want this, listen, this. and if, if we have the posture or the courage to back up and say what you said, how will that, how will we know that’s successful? What would success look like? How are we going to measure that? have you considered, I find a lot of times people will put their guard down then and like, we’re going to actually have a conversation about.

Bill Shander (06:04.793)

It is.

John Jantsch (06:26.764)

what we should be doing, I don’t have to pretend I know what to tell you to do. And I find it very disarming in a sales conversation. I mean, not to the level of being obnoxious, you know what I mean? But definitely to the level of saying, let’s think about insights instead of actions.

Bill Shander (06:30.658)

Right.

Bill Shander (06:36.42)

Totally, you’re building trust.

Bill Shander (06:40.9)

Yeah.

Bill Shander (06:45.806)

Yeah, you’re building trust the moment you do that, especially in the sales context when there’s, there’s that built in lack of trust in a way. And on top of that, you know, what, what I found in my career, the only success I’ve had in my career is because I was good at the skills, stakeholder whispering. And, know, part of that is no question. It’s the consultative approach. I’m not here.

to sell you widgets, I’m here to solve your problems. I’m here to actually help you succeed. And when you really honestly are doing that, then that includes, yeah, that asking questions like that, will lead to the right solution, not just a solution that puts dollars in my pocket.

John Jantsch (07:22.552)

So of course you’re implying that you have to actually care about getting them a result, right? Yeah. So we’ve covered one side of it, asking better questions, but what role does actually being a better listener play in this?

Bill Shander (07:26.818)

You do. You have to care and you have to be curious. Those are two things that go sort of hand in hand.

Bill Shander (07:41.848)

Yeah, active listening is something is a phrase people talk about. But do you really listen? know, and you know, what’s interesting is like, here we are, we’re having, of course, and like, you’re an interviewer in this context, and you have to do that, right? And like, when I’m talking to a client, I got to be taking notes, I got to be thinking about my next question, response, or you can’t avoid some some of that. But at the same time,

John Jantsch (07:49.07)

No, I’m thinking about the next question I’m going to ask.

Bill Shander (08:07.61)

What I encourage people to do is as best you can within that reality, you try to really listen. And a friend of mine just recently told me his phrase is, listen with your ears, not your brain. So really hear, and yeah, you’re gonna jot notes, you’re gonna notice a little trigger word, they said X, put a little circle on that, whatever, but don’t start formulating your next question as much as you can avoid it until they stop. Truly listen for that whole time.

John Jantsch (08:18.766)

Mm-hmm.

Bill Shander (08:35.354)

It’s really hard to do. None of us could do it perfectly, but we can strive towards that ideal.

John Jantsch (08:41.132)

I think it’s a little bit cultural too. think, you know, Americans are just like, we need noise. They’re like silence, you know, just kills us, right? I read a study the other day that said Americans, I think the average like silence before they become very uncomfortable is three seconds. And in Japan, it is very common for somebody to get asked a question and to literally wait for eight seconds before answering to give it thought and to give it, you know,

Bill Shander (08:50.702)

Yeah.

Bill Shander (09:04.536)

Wow.

John Jantsch (09:08.486)

emotion and I thought, you know, that’s probably I mean, most people if I sat here for eight seconds of dead air, people were like, what’s wrong? It’s pretty interesting. Yeah. Yeah.

Bill Shander (09:16.495)

Yeah.

So I have a chapter called Silence is Golden. And not only do I talk about that, but even the chapter, the book is put on the pages in a way that each page is just one sentence with silence all around it. Because it is that important, but it is uncomfortable, it’s true.

John Jantsch (09:29.42)

Yeah. Funny. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I’ve taken I’ve do some public speaking and I’ve taken some training on that and frequently a coach or something will say no let that pause let that sit let the audience digest that boy when you’re up on stage it’s like can I do it. It’s really hard. It’s funny. So so what are the

Bill Shander (09:55.186)

It is, but yeah, good, Go ahead. No, I was just gonna say, yeah, that strategic performance, which includes pauses, silence, pacing. I can speak really quickly and I can slow it down. And that has an effect on your audience for sure. Whether it’s an audience of one stakeholder or a room full of people.

John Jantsch (09:59.084)

Go ahead and finish, sir.

John Jantsch (10:15.278)

Right. So what are, let’s go with the negative. What are the common mistakes that people make? They might get the essence of this book and then charge in. What are some of the things that you see are pitfalls?

Bill Shander (10:28.312)

I mean, you one of the biggest problems people face is that they think that their job is to do what their boss tells them to do. And like on paper, there’s some truth to that, but, clients, not just bosses, clients, investors, whoever your stakeholders are, there’s a broad range of them. Obviously your job is to execute on tasks for your organization, but it’s not just to be that order taker that we talked about. So you have to, the most important thing I’m hoping people remember after reading the book.

is that they just need to do this. Like, see the world in a new way. Your job is not to execute those tasks your boss tells you to do. Your job is to succeed and help your organization succeed. And that includes probing. know, just asking, is this the right thing to be doing? Is this the right way to be doing that thing? So, step number one, acknowledge that this is a thing and just try to do something about it.

Another challenge is that some people are less whisperable than others, right? Some bosses are not so even into having these long conversations, like, you know, just do what I said, right? And obviously that takes confidence to push back and really engage your stakeholders, which also of course takes trust like we talked about. And I would say one of the third things is that, you know, it’s challenging for

John Jantsch (11:33.614)

you

Bill Shander (11:53.004)

ourselves, just sort of acknowledge to ourselves that, you know, essentially we’re all walking around being driven by our subconscious. We’re like literally all of our lives is driven by our subconscious. Tons of research shows us that we’re not very good at reasoning. We’re not really very good at deliberative thinking. We’re just being driven by our subconscious. And so if we can just think about ways to tap into the subconscious, yes, even in work, it’s like therapy, then we’re all going to do a better job doing what we need to do for.

ourselves and our organizations. And it is for ourselves also, like you’re going to be promoted if you’re the one who actually challenges the status quo, brings strategic thinking to the table and delivers against that. know duct tape marketing, the basic idea, right, is be strategic, don’t just execute on tasks, right? And so it’s a very similar way of thinking.

John Jantsch (12:40.782)

So I’m curious, have you ever considered children to be stakeholders that we have to whisper to? As I heard you say that, just do what I said. was like, that’s probably not the most current way of thinking about parenting, it?

Bill Shander (12:46.382)

They certainly could be. Yeah. I mean, and that’s

Bill Shander (12:58.264)

Yeah. And actually brings up the fourth really important thing to be thinking about and a risk, you know, a problem with this is that we don’t recognize, acknowledge, define, and prioritize all of the stakeholders. Right? So my boss tells me to do something, I do it. I am thinking my one stakeholder is my boss. No.

Your boss asked you to do that because his boss asked him and his boss, her boss. And so it’s four chains deep. And by the way, the board of directors is going to show this to their investors. Like the stakeholder list is actually this long. And now you can’t worry about all of them, but which ones are the two or the three whose opinions and actual goals really matter the most. Really zoom in on those ones and really make sure you understand their actual needs.

Like if it’s ultimately about the investors, even though your boss has you do it, they’re the real stakeholder. So make sure you understand what they really need and make sure your boss understands that they’re his stakeholder. And so that they’re involved in that stakeholder whispering with them.

John Jantsch (14:01.176)

So that brings up an interesting quant. How do you balance the fact that the objective might be to create a better experience for the customer? However, what my boss is doing, my objective has to be to keep my job. And so now I’m kind of torn between that. This isn’t really the right approach for that stakeholder. But if I want to meet this objective, how do you balance that?

Bill Shander (14:26.49)

Yeah, it’s the million dollar question. It’s hard one, right? So like some bosses, some people are not going to be very whisperable. And yeah, you could jeopardize your job with that person theoretically. I would say long term, most of the time, if you serve the customer, you’re not going to jeopardize your job.

John Jantsch (14:31.598)

Yeah.

Bill Shander (14:47.884)

and everything’s going to be for the better. Like you’re going to be the one who gets promoted. You’re going to take your boss’s job, right? Essentially, because you’re going to really solve problems. Should. Occasionally it won’t. And you either are willing to face that risk for the potential reward and or if your boss isn’t whisperable, guess what? I say, find a new boss, right? Because that’s really honestly the answer. You don’t want to work in a culture like that.

John Jantsch (14:52.782)

should work that way, right. Yeah.

John Jantsch (15:07.362)

me. Right.

John Jantsch (15:13.09)

Like so many, I would put this book into a leadership category. Hopefully that jives a little bit with what you’re thinking. And it seems like most leadership ideas really start with the culture of the organization.

Bill Shander (15:22.51)

Yeah, definitely.

Bill Shander (15:29.166)

They definitely do. Yeah. And I have a chapter at the end, which is called some love for my stakeholders or some love for the stakeholders. And I talk about the fact is first of all, I do, I love my stakeholders and it’s not just like blowing smoke. I’ve really enjoyed the work that I’ve done for the last 30 plus years. I’ve enjoyed working with the vast majority of my clients and I really, am curious and I do care and I want to help them. And so.

When I think, when I talk to them in the book, I say, first of all, thank you for teaching me for all these years how to do what I do. But then I also do turn the page a little bit on them and say, okay, now you may be reading this because you’re a middle manager. Guess what? You’re somebody else’s boss, aren’t you? Also, you are somebody’s stakeholder today, even though you’re thinking of as the order taker. So how whisperable are you? And so companies need to develop the culture where they create.

know, cultures of whisperability. And I have some clients who have amazing cultures where they, listen to me, they listen to their employees. It’s not about hierarchy or anything else. And I’ve worked for, you know, as a vendor for some companies that were really not whisperable at all. And I didn’t work for them for, for very long for a variety of reasons, but it’s really hard to be in that type of environment.

John Jantsch (16:45.262)

You have a chapter about, I mean, so many people are working either hybrid or remote or does that change kind of the framework at all or the structure or does it just add kind of another layer of complexity?

Bill Shander (17:01.978)

think it adds another layer complexity for sure because communications is harder, right? Like right now, I’m not looking at you, I’m looking at my camera, but the viewer is looking at my eyes. So at least there’s some eye contact it feels like happening. And so, you know, when it’s all on Zoom, it’s harder to have that real, really productive conversation, certainly better, you know, the body language and all kinds of other things disappear. So there’s definitely that added complexity.

But the process is still the same. You’ve got to have conversations. You’ve got to ask good questions. And something we didn’t talk about, but there’s a key part to the question asking, which is when I ask my stakeholders questions, I’m not doing it to learn the answers. It’s actually the other way around. It’s more of a Socratic dialogue. I’m asking them questions so that they can learn the answers. I want them to figure out what they actually need from me. I’m not trying to guide them. I’m not trying to tell them. I want them to figure it out. It’s like therapy.

John Jantsch (17:44.483)

Yes.

Bill Shander (17:58.848)

Once they figure it out, then I’ll do that. And so the question asking is a very, it’s a two-way street for sure, but the goal is really to help them learn as much as to help me learn.

John Jantsch (18:11.406)

Yeah, you you call it therapy, but it really strikes me. It’s a lot like coaching in some ways. mean, you’re almost coaching people to think about things that maybe haven’t even considered. know, one of my favorite phrases or least favorite phrases is, that’s the way we’ve always done it. Or that’s the way everybody in our industry does it. And, you know, just to even say, anybody ask why? So we’ve always done it that way. It’s amazing how often people will go, you know, I don’t know.

Bill Shander (18:16.591)

Yeah.

Bill Shander (18:28.515)

Right.

Yeah.

Bill Shander (18:36.697)

you

Bill Shander (18:41.55)

Yeah, it’s true.

John Jantsch (18:41.586)

the answer to that. So do you have any in the book or anything you want to anybody you’ve worked with clients that you’ve worked with kind of a real story or example where you know stakeholder whispering has really led to a far better outcome.

Bill Shander (18:58.99)

Yeah, I I tell one story in the book and it’s funny on the surface. It’s a really boring story. It’s not the most dynamic anecdote in the history of the world at all, but it’s one of the most, the moment when this happened was like really eyeopening for me. so was working on project. was doing this data dashboard essentially for this client and we’re having this conversation about whether we should show the rank position.

of countries on this one metric being measured. So this country is number one, two, three, four, five, or should we show the actual score they got on this measurement? So let’s imagine it’s about web analytics. Should we show the number of clicks they got or just the ranking in terms of clicks? And their argument was the way this type of data usually works, the way it’s always been done, is we always just show the rank because people care if their country ahead or behind their favorite country that they want to compete against. But the scores…

John Jantsch (19:37.526)

Thank

Bill Shander (19:55.364)

were universally really, really high. Very few countries had a low score. So you might’ve been ranked 150th. That looks terrible, that sounds awful. But guess what? You had a super high score, just like everybody else. Only a few countries were actually bad. And so was trying to make the case that maybe we should show the actual score because the fact that this country was ranked low didn’t mean they had an actual problem. And so the data…

John Jantsch (20:17.184)

Yeah, they could close 50 places pretty easily.

Bill Shander (20:20.886)

Exactly. They could close it easily and it didn’t matter where they were anyways, as long as they were above X score. And so, you know, I’m asking all these questions. We’re having this really long debate and she almost convinced me five times. I almost convinced her five times. But the point was, you know, it was a very open ended conversation, mostly each of us asking each other questions. and in the end, you know, there was this one moment where she said just literally, she said the word something to the effect of, I never saw it that way before.

John Jantsch (20:24.59)

Yeah.

Bill Shander (20:50.446)

You’re right. And it wasn’t gratifying because I was right, although that’s nice, you know, but it was really because there was this moment of just incredible open-mindedness to your point. Like, why have we always done it that way? Who the hell knows? Like, well, why should we do it that way? Maybe we should consider, maybe we won’t change it, but maybe we should at least look at doing it this other way. And even that I consider a win.

John Jantsch (20:50.819)

Thanks.

John Jantsch (21:15.222)

Yeah, awesome. Well, Bill, I appreciate you taking a few moments to stop by the show. You want to invite people to connect with you somewhere, find out more about your work, obviously find out more about stakeholder risk.

Bill Shander (21:26.136)

Yeah, you can always find me on my website, BillShander.com. And I’m always happy to connect with people on LinkedIn as well.

John Jantsch (21:32.3)

Well again, I appreciate you stopping by. Hopefully we’ll see you one of these days out there on the road.

Bill Shander (21:36.794)

Thank you very much, John. Nice talking to you.

powered by

The Website Is No Longer the Marketing Hub: How AI Is Reshaping Customer Journeys

The Website Is No Longer the Marketing Hub: How AI Is Reshaping Customer Journeys written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

Marketing has shifted. Your website is no longer the central hub of your customer’s journey. AI-powered assistants, chatbots, and large language models are now curating content and guiding buyer behavior in ways your site never touches. If you’re not structuring content for AI visibility or building assets that live beyond your domain, you’re falling behind. […]

Helping Stakeholders Help Themselves written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

Listen to the full episode:

Overview

In this episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast, John Jantsch talks with Bill Shander, information designer, data communications expert, and founder of Beehive Media. Bill shares insights from his new book, “Stakeholder Whispering: Uncover What People Need Before Doing What They Ask.” The conversation covers how to turn complex data into clear, actionable stories, the importance of questioning order-taking, and why active listening and genuine curiosity are the keys to building trust and delivering what stakeholders truly need. Listeners will learn practical strategies for stakeholder engagement, leadership, and data-driven decision-making in the age of AI.

About the Guest

Bill Shander is a data communications expert, information designer, and founder of Beehive Media. With over 25 years of experience, he has helped leading organizations—including the United Nations, World Bank, and Deloitte—turn complex ideas into clear, actionable stories. Bill is a recognized thought leader in data visualization, storytelling, and stakeholder engagement, and is the author of “Stakeholder Whispering: Uncover What People Need Before Doing What They Ask.”

Actionable Insights

  • Data storytelling is about communicating meaning and insight, not just sharing numbers and reports.
  • Order-taking leads to missed opportunities; real value comes from questioning, listening, and guiding stakeholders to what they truly need.
  • Active listening, curiosity, and asking better questions are essential for building trust and uncovering stakeholders’ real objectives.
  • Silence is a powerful tool for reflection and better conversation—embrace the pause to allow deeper thinking.
  • Stakeholder engagement applies to all roles, not just marketing—including HR, IT, and leadership.
  • Recognize and prioritize all stakeholders—sometimes the real goals and needs come from several layers up in the organization.
  • In hybrid and remote work environments, intentional communication and Socratic questioning are even more important.
  • Organizational culture and leadership openness determine how effective “stakeholder whispering” can be—seek or build a culture that values questioning and strategic thinking.

Great Moments (with Timestamps)

  • 00:45 – What is a Data Communication Expert?
    Bill explains the importance of storytelling and visualization in making data meaningful.
  • 01:44 – Why Stakeholder Whispering Matters More Than Ever
    Why questioning and guiding stakeholders is critical in the age of AI and short attention spans.
  • 04:28 – Beyond Order-Taking: Leading with Questions
    Bill shares why challenging requests and using a consultative approach delivers better results.
  • 07:41 – The Power of Active Listening and Curiosity
    Tips for asking better questions and truly hearing stakeholders’ needs.
  • 09:16 – Silence is Golden
    The value of pausing, reflection, and pacing in communication and presentations.
  • 10:28 – Common Pitfalls: Mistaking Tasks for Outcomes
    Why focusing only on what’s requested misses the real goals.
  • 12:58 – Recognizing the Real Stakeholders
    How to identify and prioritize who really matters in any project or initiative.
  • 15:13 – Culture, Leadership, and Whisperability
    The role of culture and leadership in fostering open, strategic conversations.
  • 17:01 – Adapting Stakeholder Engagement to Hybrid and Remote Work
    Why face-to-face or Socratic dialogue is essential for discovering true needs.
  • 18:58 – Real-World Example: The Power of Questioning Assumptions
    Bill tells a client story where open-ended questioning led to a far better outcome.

Pulled Quotes

“Our job is not just to execute tasks—it’s to succeed and help our organization succeed. That means probing, questioning, and challenging the status quo.”
— Bill Shander

“Active listening, curiosity, and asking the right questions are what build trust and uncover what stakeholders really need.”
— Bill Shander

John Jantsch (00:00.878)

Hello and welcome to another episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast. This is John Jantsch and my guest today is Bill Shander. He’s a data communications expert, information designer and founder of Beehive Media. Over 25 years of experience, Bill has helped leading organizations, including United Nations, World Bank and Deloitte turn complex ideas into clear, actionable stories. We’re going to talk about his latest book today, Stakeholder Whispering, Uncover What People Need.

before doing what they ask. So Bill, welcome to the show.

Bill Shander (00:34.34)

Thank you, John. I’m really happy to be here.

John Jantsch (00:36.736)

So I just, sometimes people have things in their bios that I have to ask about. So what does a data communication expert do?

Bill Shander (00:45.654)

That’s a good question. So, you know, everybody these days has data, whether it’s your sales data, your marketing data, your HR data, everybody has data. We’re always packaging it up in PowerPoint presentations to present to our bosses or reports for the board or whoever. And people don’t really do a very good job of it either because they’re not really thinking about communicating ideas. They’re worried about shoving numbers at people. And so I help people.

John Jantsch (01:09.314)

Yeah. Right.

Bill Shander (01:12.216)

tell stories of data, as well as visualize that data in an impactful way.

John Jantsch (01:16.462)

Yeah. And I think there’s probably a lot of people, myself included, that I want to hear the story. Like, what does this data mean? you know, rather than just saying, look, we got this much traffic. Okay. Is that good? Is that bad? Yeah. So what inspired you to write the book? I mean, is there, is there something going on today, you know, in the business world that you think it makes this idea more critical?

Bill Shander (01:22.553)

Yeah.

Bill Shander (01:29.014)

Exactly. How many clicks is good? Are clicks even useful? We don’t know.

Bill Shander (01:44.378)

That’s a good question. I don’t know if today it’s more critical in that this has always been an issue, honestly. I’ve been looking at it for 30 years and took me a long time to realize that this is the thing. Like I’ve been thinking about doing a book for a long time and this was finally the idea of the nugget that said, yes, this must be done. It’s been an issue that’s been around forever. Is it more important today than ever? I would say maybe possibly because of AI. mean, okay, we’re already talking about AI, know, it’s 2025, of course you have to, but.

Honestly, when you ask AI to do something, it just does it. AI is an order taker. And we as humans, what can we do better than AI today? Maybe we can still discern, what really should be done? And maybe we can ask good follow-up questions on all the kinds of things that I talk about in the book that we have to do in order to make sure we’re delivering against the right tasks. AI is just going to do it. So it’s even more important for that reason.

John Jantsch (02:19.064)

Yeah. Yeah.

John Jantsch (02:38.198)

Yeah. You know, it’s interesting. mean, I think you can make a case for being more important today and in some ways, because what you mentioned AI actually allows us to crunch a lot more data than we ever would have been able to in some cases. so we certainly have that even the smallest of companies have access now to big crunching. But I think also, I noticed a lot of people, stakeholders included, you know, have much shorter attention spans. And so,

Bill Shander (02:57.082)

Yeah.

John Jantsch (03:04.258)

You know, that 27 page PowerPoint deck, you know, can be condensed into a story or a metaphor. You know, that might actually be a better way to present the information.

Bill Shander (03:15.748)

Well, that’s it. so stakeholder whispering is, you the basic idea is your stakeholders ask you to do things based on their automated response. How do we usually do it? Well, usually we put it to 27 page PowerPoint deck together. And the problem is to what you said, you know, first of all, attention spans are shrinking a hundred other reasons why that may not be the best solution. But on top of that, like,

I mean, they don’t even know what they need. They’re just going to go with the automated response. And so our job as workers, and it doesn’t matter what role you’re in, if it’s marketing, great, but HR people need this, IT people, finance, et cetera. Whatever we’re working on, we need to question the ask, know, question that automated response. Maybe it is a PowerPoint deck that’s needed, or maybe not to your point.

John Jantsch (04:03.928)

So you mentioned the word order taking, know, I actually, ironically, somebody just said this to me the other day. We have to, you know, we have to sell them what they want so that we can get the trust to sell them what they need. You’ve probably heard that before and you’re kind of advocating for the idea that, no, we need to lead them to what they need and not, you know, and maybe use numbers to help do that. Talk a little more about that idea of beyond order taking.

Bill Shander (04:15.502)

Yeah. Yeah.

Bill Shander (04:28.738)

Yeah. And what you just said is also true, right? Like you do have to gain trust before you can lead them effectively. But yes, the fact is our stakeholders don’t know what they need and our job is to guide them. I often say it’s like therapy. I have a whole chapter in the book about how to conduct a therapy session because it is very much like therapy. Someone comes to a therapist because they have an issue and they need help. And the therapist doesn’t tell them what to do.

They ask them questions. say, well, how does that make you feel? Right? And the questions, right. And the questions allow you to look inside yourself and say, wait, yeah. How does that make me feel? And so in work, okay, you know, we’re launching a new product marketing, make us a brochure. Okay. You know, why would a brochure be better than an app or better than this, that, or the other? Huh? Yeah. Maybe, maybe we should do an app. that introspective opportunity is what guides us down the road towards maybe another option.

John Jantsch (04:56.406)

Yeah. Why do we want that?

Bill Shander (05:24.634)

you know, when you’re new, like you’re in a new role, new boss, whatever, you haven’t gained that trust yet, maybe all you do is you try one thing, one question, which is, the question could be, how do we measure success? How are we gonna know this is gonna, when this has worked, how are we gonna measure that? And just that one question, it’s not gonna get them all the way to some new way of thinking maybe.

but it’s an initial ask. It’s at least one step beyond overtaking. And then over time, you’ll gain more trust and you’ll be able to sort of expand on that guidance way of thinking about it.

John Jantsch (05:58.144)

You know, what I have found is, is that’s a, that’s an incredible technique in selling. you know, a lot of times people will come to us and say, want this, listen, this. and if, if we have the posture or the courage to back up and say what you said, how will that, how will we know that’s successful? What would success look like? How are we going to measure that? have you considered, I find a lot of times people will put their guard down then and like, we’re going to actually have a conversation about.

Bill Shander (06:04.793)

It is.

John Jantsch (06:26.764)

what we should be doing, I don’t have to pretend I know what to tell you to do. And I find it very disarming in a sales conversation. I mean, not to the level of being obnoxious, you know what I mean? But definitely to the level of saying, let’s think about insights instead of actions.

Bill Shander (06:30.658)

Right.

Bill Shander (06:36.42)

Totally, you’re building trust.

Bill Shander (06:40.9)

Yeah.

Bill Shander (06:45.806)

Yeah, you’re building trust the moment you do that, especially in the sales context when there’s, there’s that built in lack of trust in a way. And on top of that, you know, what, what I found in my career, the only success I’ve had in my career is because I was good at the skills, stakeholder whispering. And, know, part of that is no question. It’s the consultative approach. I’m not here.

to sell you widgets, I’m here to solve your problems. I’m here to actually help you succeed. And when you really honestly are doing that, then that includes, yeah, that asking questions like that, will lead to the right solution, not just a solution that puts dollars in my pocket.

John Jantsch (07:22.552)

So of course you’re implying that you have to actually care about getting them a result, right? Yeah. So we’ve covered one side of it, asking better questions, but what role does actually being a better listener play in this?

Bill Shander (07:26.818)

You do. You have to care and you have to be curious. Those are two things that go sort of hand in hand.

Bill Shander (07:41.848)

Yeah, active listening is something is a phrase people talk about. But do you really listen? know, and you know, what’s interesting is like, here we are, we’re having, of course, and like, you’re an interviewer in this context, and you have to do that, right? And like, when I’m talking to a client, I got to be taking notes, I got to be thinking about my next question, response, or you can’t avoid some some of that. But at the same time,

John Jantsch (07:49.07)

No, I’m thinking about the next question I’m going to ask.

Bill Shander (08:07.61)

What I encourage people to do is as best you can within that reality, you try to really listen. And a friend of mine just recently told me his phrase is, listen with your ears, not your brain. So really hear, and yeah, you’re gonna jot notes, you’re gonna notice a little trigger word, they said X, put a little circle on that, whatever, but don’t start formulating your next question as much as you can avoid it until they stop. Truly listen for that whole time.

John Jantsch (08:18.766)

Mm-hmm.

Bill Shander (08:35.354)

It’s really hard to do. None of us could do it perfectly, but we can strive towards that ideal.

John Jantsch (08:41.132)

I think it’s a little bit cultural too. think, you know, Americans are just like, we need noise. They’re like silence, you know, just kills us, right? I read a study the other day that said Americans, I think the average like silence before they become very uncomfortable is three seconds. And in Japan, it is very common for somebody to get asked a question and to literally wait for eight seconds before answering to give it thought and to give it, you know,

Bill Shander (08:50.702)

Yeah.

Bill Shander (09:04.536)

Wow.

John Jantsch (09:08.486)

emotion and I thought, you know, that’s probably I mean, most people if I sat here for eight seconds of dead air, people were like, what’s wrong? It’s pretty interesting. Yeah. Yeah.

Bill Shander (09:16.495)

Yeah.

So I have a chapter called Silence is Golden. And not only do I talk about that, but even the chapter, the book is put on the pages in a way that each page is just one sentence with silence all around it. Because it is that important, but it is uncomfortable, it’s true.

John Jantsch (09:29.42)

Yeah. Funny. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I’ve taken I’ve do some public speaking and I’ve taken some training on that and frequently a coach or something will say no let that pause let that sit let the audience digest that boy when you’re up on stage it’s like can I do it. It’s really hard. It’s funny. So so what are the

Bill Shander (09:55.186)

It is, but yeah, good, Go ahead. No, I was just gonna say, yeah, that strategic performance, which includes pauses, silence, pacing. I can speak really quickly and I can slow it down. And that has an effect on your audience for sure. Whether it’s an audience of one stakeholder or a room full of people.

John Jantsch (09:59.084)

Go ahead and finish, sir.

John Jantsch (10:15.278)

Right. So what are, let’s go with the negative. What are the common mistakes that people make? They might get the essence of this book and then charge in. What are some of the things that you see are pitfalls?

Bill Shander (10:28.312)

I mean, you one of the biggest problems people face is that they think that their job is to do what their boss tells them to do. And like on paper, there’s some truth to that, but, clients, not just bosses, clients, investors, whoever your stakeholders are, there’s a broad range of them. Obviously your job is to execute on tasks for your organization, but it’s not just to be that order taker that we talked about. So you have to, the most important thing I’m hoping people remember after reading the book.

is that they just need to do this. Like, see the world in a new way. Your job is not to execute those tasks your boss tells you to do. Your job is to succeed and help your organization succeed. And that includes probing. know, just asking, is this the right thing to be doing? Is this the right way to be doing that thing? So, step number one, acknowledge that this is a thing and just try to do something about it.

Another challenge is that some people are less whisperable than others, right? Some bosses are not so even into having these long conversations, like, you know, just do what I said, right? And obviously that takes confidence to push back and really engage your stakeholders, which also of course takes trust like we talked about. And I would say one of the third things is that, you know, it’s challenging for

John Jantsch (11:33.614)

you

Bill Shander (11:53.004)

ourselves, just sort of acknowledge to ourselves that, you know, essentially we’re all walking around being driven by our subconscious. We’re like literally all of our lives is driven by our subconscious. Tons of research shows us that we’re not very good at reasoning. We’re not really very good at deliberative thinking. We’re just being driven by our subconscious. And so if we can just think about ways to tap into the subconscious, yes, even in work, it’s like therapy, then we’re all going to do a better job doing what we need to do for.

ourselves and our organizations. And it is for ourselves also, like you’re going to be promoted if you’re the one who actually challenges the status quo, brings strategic thinking to the table and delivers against that. know duct tape marketing, the basic idea, right, is be strategic, don’t just execute on tasks, right? And so it’s a very similar way of thinking.

John Jantsch (12:40.782)

So I’m curious, have you ever considered children to be stakeholders that we have to whisper to? As I heard you say that, just do what I said. was like, that’s probably not the most current way of thinking about parenting, it?

Bill Shander (12:46.382)

They certainly could be. Yeah. I mean, and that’s

Bill Shander (12:58.264)

Yeah. And actually brings up the fourth really important thing to be thinking about and a risk, you know, a problem with this is that we don’t recognize, acknowledge, define, and prioritize all of the stakeholders. Right? So my boss tells me to do something, I do it. I am thinking my one stakeholder is my boss. No.

Your boss asked you to do that because his boss asked him and his boss, her boss. And so it’s four chains deep. And by the way, the board of directors is going to show this to their investors. Like the stakeholder list is actually this long. And now you can’t worry about all of them, but which ones are the two or the three whose opinions and actual goals really matter the most. Really zoom in on those ones and really make sure you understand their actual needs.

Like if it’s ultimately about the investors, even though your boss has you do it, they’re the real stakeholder. So make sure you understand what they really need and make sure your boss understands that they’re his stakeholder. And so that they’re involved in that stakeholder whispering with them.

John Jantsch (14:01.176)

So that brings up an interesting quant. How do you balance the fact that the objective might be to create a better experience for the customer? However, what my boss is doing, my objective has to be to keep my job. And so now I’m kind of torn between that. This isn’t really the right approach for that stakeholder. But if I want to meet this objective, how do you balance that?

Bill Shander (14:26.49)

Yeah, it’s the million dollar question. It’s hard one, right? So like some bosses, some people are not going to be very whisperable. And yeah, you could jeopardize your job with that person theoretically. I would say long term, most of the time, if you serve the customer, you’re not going to jeopardize your job.

John Jantsch (14:31.598)

Yeah.

Bill Shander (14:47.884)

and everything’s going to be for the better. Like you’re going to be the one who gets promoted. You’re going to take your boss’s job, right? Essentially, because you’re going to really solve problems. Should. Occasionally it won’t. And you either are willing to face that risk for the potential reward and or if your boss isn’t whisperable, guess what? I say, find a new boss, right? Because that’s really honestly the answer. You don’t want to work in a culture like that.

John Jantsch (14:52.782)

should work that way, right. Yeah.

John Jantsch (15:07.362)

me. Right.

John Jantsch (15:13.09)

Like so many, I would put this book into a leadership category. Hopefully that jives a little bit with what you’re thinking. And it seems like most leadership ideas really start with the culture of the organization.

Bill Shander (15:22.51)

Yeah, definitely.

Bill Shander (15:29.166)

They definitely do. Yeah. And I have a chapter at the end, which is called some love for my stakeholders or some love for the stakeholders. And I talk about the fact is first of all, I do, I love my stakeholders and it’s not just like blowing smoke. I’ve really enjoyed the work that I’ve done for the last 30 plus years. I’ve enjoyed working with the vast majority of my clients and I really, am curious and I do care and I want to help them. And so.

When I think, when I talk to them in the book, I say, first of all, thank you for teaching me for all these years how to do what I do. But then I also do turn the page a little bit on them and say, okay, now you may be reading this because you’re a middle manager. Guess what? You’re somebody else’s boss, aren’t you? Also, you are somebody’s stakeholder today, even though you’re thinking of as the order taker. So how whisperable are you? And so companies need to develop the culture where they create.

know, cultures of whisperability. And I have some clients who have amazing cultures where they, listen to me, they listen to their employees. It’s not about hierarchy or anything else. And I’ve worked for, you know, as a vendor for some companies that were really not whisperable at all. And I didn’t work for them for, for very long for a variety of reasons, but it’s really hard to be in that type of environment.

John Jantsch (16:45.262)

You have a chapter about, I mean, so many people are working either hybrid or remote or does that change kind of the framework at all or the structure or does it just add kind of another layer of complexity?

Bill Shander (17:01.978)

think it adds another layer complexity for sure because communications is harder, right? Like right now, I’m not looking at you, I’m looking at my camera, but the viewer is looking at my eyes. So at least there’s some eye contact it feels like happening. And so, you know, when it’s all on Zoom, it’s harder to have that real, really productive conversation, certainly better, you know, the body language and all kinds of other things disappear. So there’s definitely that added complexity.

But the process is still the same. You’ve got to have conversations. You’ve got to ask good questions. And something we didn’t talk about, but there’s a key part to the question asking, which is when I ask my stakeholders questions, I’m not doing it to learn the answers. It’s actually the other way around. It’s more of a Socratic dialogue. I’m asking them questions so that they can learn the answers. I want them to figure out what they actually need from me. I’m not trying to guide them. I’m not trying to tell them. I want them to figure it out. It’s like therapy.

John Jantsch (17:44.483)

Yes.

Bill Shander (17:58.848)

Once they figure it out, then I’ll do that. And so the question asking is a very, it’s a two-way street for sure, but the goal is really to help them learn as much as to help me learn.

John Jantsch (18:11.406)

Yeah, you you call it therapy, but it really strikes me. It’s a lot like coaching in some ways. mean, you’re almost coaching people to think about things that maybe haven’t even considered. know, one of my favorite phrases or least favorite phrases is, that’s the way we’ve always done it. Or that’s the way everybody in our industry does it. And, you know, just to even say, anybody ask why? So we’ve always done it that way. It’s amazing how often people will go, you know, I don’t know.

Bill Shander (18:16.591)

Yeah.

Bill Shander (18:28.515)

Right.

Yeah.

Bill Shander (18:36.697)

you

Bill Shander (18:41.55)

Yeah, it’s true.

John Jantsch (18:41.586)

the answer to that. So do you have any in the book or anything you want to anybody you’ve worked with clients that you’ve worked with kind of a real story or example where you know stakeholder whispering has really led to a far better outcome.

Bill Shander (18:58.99)

Yeah, I I tell one story in the book and it’s funny on the surface. It’s a really boring story. It’s not the most dynamic anecdote in the history of the world at all, but it’s one of the most, the moment when this happened was like really eyeopening for me. so was working on project. was doing this data dashboard essentially for this client and we’re having this conversation about whether we should show the rank position.

of countries on this one metric being measured. So this country is number one, two, three, four, five, or should we show the actual score they got on this measurement? So let’s imagine it’s about web analytics. Should we show the number of clicks they got or just the ranking in terms of clicks? And their argument was the way this type of data usually works, the way it’s always been done, is we always just show the rank because people care if their country ahead or behind their favorite country that they want to compete against. But the scores…

John Jantsch (19:37.526)

Thank

Bill Shander (19:55.364)

were universally really, really high. Very few countries had a low score. So you might’ve been ranked 150th. That looks terrible, that sounds awful. But guess what? You had a super high score, just like everybody else. Only a few countries were actually bad. And so was trying to make the case that maybe we should show the actual score because the fact that this country was ranked low didn’t mean they had an actual problem. And so the data…

John Jantsch (20:17.184)

Yeah, they could close 50 places pretty easily.

Bill Shander (20:20.886)

Exactly. They could close it easily and it didn’t matter where they were anyways, as long as they were above X score. And so, you know, I’m asking all these questions. We’re having this really long debate and she almost convinced me five times. I almost convinced her five times. But the point was, you know, it was a very open ended conversation, mostly each of us asking each other questions. and in the end, you know, there was this one moment where she said just literally, she said the word something to the effect of, I never saw it that way before.

John Jantsch (20:24.59)

Yeah.

Bill Shander (20:50.446)

You’re right. And it wasn’t gratifying because I was right, although that’s nice, you know, but it was really because there was this moment of just incredible open-mindedness to your point. Like, why have we always done it that way? Who the hell knows? Like, well, why should we do it that way? Maybe we should consider, maybe we won’t change it, but maybe we should at least look at doing it this other way. And even that I consider a win.

John Jantsch (20:50.819)

Thanks.

John Jantsch (21:15.222)

Yeah, awesome. Well, Bill, I appreciate you taking a few moments to stop by the show. You want to invite people to connect with you somewhere, find out more about your work, obviously find out more about stakeholder risk.

Bill Shander (21:26.136)

Yeah, you can always find me on my website, BillShander.com. And I’m always happy to connect with people on LinkedIn as well.

John Jantsch (21:32.3)

Well again, I appreciate you stopping by. Hopefully we’ll see you one of these days out there on the road.

Bill Shander (21:36.794)

Thank you very much, John. Nice talking to you.

powered by

SEO’s Next Era: Manick Bhan on AI, Content Strategy, and Building a Brand That Lasts

SEO’s Next Era: Manick Bhan on AI, Content Strategy, and Building a Brand That Lasts written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

Listen to the full episode: Overview In this episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast, John Jantsch interviews Manick Ban, founder and CTO of Search Atlas—a next-generation SEO and content marketing platform. Manick shares his journey from building RankPay to scaling Search Atlas, and explains why the future of SEO depends on actionable insights, platform […]

Helping Stakeholders Help Themselves written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

Listen to the full episode:

Overview

In this episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast, John Jantsch talks with Bill Shander, information designer, data communications expert, and founder of Beehive Media. Bill shares insights from his new book, “Stakeholder Whispering: Uncover What People Need Before Doing What They Ask.” The conversation covers how to turn complex data into clear, actionable stories, the importance of questioning order-taking, and why active listening and genuine curiosity are the keys to building trust and delivering what stakeholders truly need. Listeners will learn practical strategies for stakeholder engagement, leadership, and data-driven decision-making in the age of AI.

About the Guest

Bill Shander is a data communications expert, information designer, and founder of Beehive Media. With over 25 years of experience, he has helped leading organizations—including the United Nations, World Bank, and Deloitte—turn complex ideas into clear, actionable stories. Bill is a recognized thought leader in data visualization, storytelling, and stakeholder engagement, and is the author of “Stakeholder Whispering: Uncover What People Need Before Doing What They Ask.”

Actionable Insights

  • Data storytelling is about communicating meaning and insight, not just sharing numbers and reports.
  • Order-taking leads to missed opportunities; real value comes from questioning, listening, and guiding stakeholders to what they truly need.
  • Active listening, curiosity, and asking better questions are essential for building trust and uncovering stakeholders’ real objectives.
  • Silence is a powerful tool for reflection and better conversation—embrace the pause to allow deeper thinking.
  • Stakeholder engagement applies to all roles, not just marketing—including HR, IT, and leadership.
  • Recognize and prioritize all stakeholders—sometimes the real goals and needs come from several layers up in the organization.
  • In hybrid and remote work environments, intentional communication and Socratic questioning are even more important.
  • Organizational culture and leadership openness determine how effective “stakeholder whispering” can be—seek or build a culture that values questioning and strategic thinking.

Great Moments (with Timestamps)

  • 00:45 – What is a Data Communication Expert?
    Bill explains the importance of storytelling and visualization in making data meaningful.
  • 01:44 – Why Stakeholder Whispering Matters More Than Ever
    Why questioning and guiding stakeholders is critical in the age of AI and short attention spans.
  • 04:28 – Beyond Order-Taking: Leading with Questions
    Bill shares why challenging requests and using a consultative approach delivers better results.
  • 07:41 – The Power of Active Listening and Curiosity
    Tips for asking better questions and truly hearing stakeholders’ needs.
  • 09:16 – Silence is Golden
    The value of pausing, reflection, and pacing in communication and presentations.
  • 10:28 – Common Pitfalls: Mistaking Tasks for Outcomes
    Why focusing only on what’s requested misses the real goals.
  • 12:58 – Recognizing the Real Stakeholders
    How to identify and prioritize who really matters in any project or initiative.
  • 15:13 – Culture, Leadership, and Whisperability
    The role of culture and leadership in fostering open, strategic conversations.
  • 17:01 – Adapting Stakeholder Engagement to Hybrid and Remote Work
    Why face-to-face or Socratic dialogue is essential for discovering true needs.
  • 18:58 – Real-World Example: The Power of Questioning Assumptions
    Bill tells a client story where open-ended questioning led to a far better outcome.

Pulled Quotes

“Our job is not just to execute tasks—it’s to succeed and help our organization succeed. That means probing, questioning, and challenging the status quo.”
— Bill Shander

“Active listening, curiosity, and asking the right questions are what build trust and uncover what stakeholders really need.”
— Bill Shander

John Jantsch (00:00.878)

Hello and welcome to another episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast. This is John Jantsch and my guest today is Bill Shander. He’s a data communications expert, information designer and founder of Beehive Media. Over 25 years of experience, Bill has helped leading organizations, including United Nations, World Bank and Deloitte turn complex ideas into clear, actionable stories. We’re going to talk about his latest book today, Stakeholder Whispering, Uncover What People Need.

before doing what they ask. So Bill, welcome to the show.

Bill Shander (00:34.34)

Thank you, John. I’m really happy to be here.

John Jantsch (00:36.736)

So I just, sometimes people have things in their bios that I have to ask about. So what does a data communication expert do?

Bill Shander (00:45.654)

That’s a good question. So, you know, everybody these days has data, whether it’s your sales data, your marketing data, your HR data, everybody has data. We’re always packaging it up in PowerPoint presentations to present to our bosses or reports for the board or whoever. And people don’t really do a very good job of it either because they’re not really thinking about communicating ideas. They’re worried about shoving numbers at people. And so I help people.

John Jantsch (01:09.314)

Yeah. Right.

Bill Shander (01:12.216)

tell stories of data, as well as visualize that data in an impactful way.

John Jantsch (01:16.462)

Yeah. And I think there’s probably a lot of people, myself included, that I want to hear the story. Like, what does this data mean? you know, rather than just saying, look, we got this much traffic. Okay. Is that good? Is that bad? Yeah. So what inspired you to write the book? I mean, is there, is there something going on today, you know, in the business world that you think it makes this idea more critical?

Bill Shander (01:22.553)

Yeah.

Bill Shander (01:29.014)

Exactly. How many clicks is good? Are clicks even useful? We don’t know.

Bill Shander (01:44.378)

That’s a good question. I don’t know if today it’s more critical in that this has always been an issue, honestly. I’ve been looking at it for 30 years and took me a long time to realize that this is the thing. Like I’ve been thinking about doing a book for a long time and this was finally the idea of the nugget that said, yes, this must be done. It’s been an issue that’s been around forever. Is it more important today than ever? I would say maybe possibly because of AI. mean, okay, we’re already talking about AI, know, it’s 2025, of course you have to, but.

Honestly, when you ask AI to do something, it just does it. AI is an order taker. And we as humans, what can we do better than AI today? Maybe we can still discern, what really should be done? And maybe we can ask good follow-up questions on all the kinds of things that I talk about in the book that we have to do in order to make sure we’re delivering against the right tasks. AI is just going to do it. So it’s even more important for that reason.

John Jantsch (02:19.064)

Yeah. Yeah.

John Jantsch (02:38.198)

Yeah. You know, it’s interesting. mean, I think you can make a case for being more important today and in some ways, because what you mentioned AI actually allows us to crunch a lot more data than we ever would have been able to in some cases. so we certainly have that even the smallest of companies have access now to big crunching. But I think also, I noticed a lot of people, stakeholders included, you know, have much shorter attention spans. And so,

Bill Shander (02:57.082)

Yeah.

John Jantsch (03:04.258)

You know, that 27 page PowerPoint deck, you know, can be condensed into a story or a metaphor. You know, that might actually be a better way to present the information.

Bill Shander (03:15.748)

Well, that’s it. so stakeholder whispering is, you the basic idea is your stakeholders ask you to do things based on their automated response. How do we usually do it? Well, usually we put it to 27 page PowerPoint deck together. And the problem is to what you said, you know, first of all, attention spans are shrinking a hundred other reasons why that may not be the best solution. But on top of that, like,

I mean, they don’t even know what they need. They’re just going to go with the automated response. And so our job as workers, and it doesn’t matter what role you’re in, if it’s marketing, great, but HR people need this, IT people, finance, et cetera. Whatever we’re working on, we need to question the ask, know, question that automated response. Maybe it is a PowerPoint deck that’s needed, or maybe not to your point.

John Jantsch (04:03.928)

So you mentioned the word order taking, know, I actually, ironically, somebody just said this to me the other day. We have to, you know, we have to sell them what they want so that we can get the trust to sell them what they need. You’ve probably heard that before and you’re kind of advocating for the idea that, no, we need to lead them to what they need and not, you know, and maybe use numbers to help do that. Talk a little more about that idea of beyond order taking.

Bill Shander (04:15.502)

Yeah. Yeah.

Bill Shander (04:28.738)

Yeah. And what you just said is also true, right? Like you do have to gain trust before you can lead them effectively. But yes, the fact is our stakeholders don’t know what they need and our job is to guide them. I often say it’s like therapy. I have a whole chapter in the book about how to conduct a therapy session because it is very much like therapy. Someone comes to a therapist because they have an issue and they need help. And the therapist doesn’t tell them what to do.

They ask them questions. say, well, how does that make you feel? Right? And the questions, right. And the questions allow you to look inside yourself and say, wait, yeah. How does that make me feel? And so in work, okay, you know, we’re launching a new product marketing, make us a brochure. Okay. You know, why would a brochure be better than an app or better than this, that, or the other? Huh? Yeah. Maybe, maybe we should do an app. that introspective opportunity is what guides us down the road towards maybe another option.

John Jantsch (04:56.406)

Yeah. Why do we want that?

Bill Shander (05:24.634)

you know, when you’re new, like you’re in a new role, new boss, whatever, you haven’t gained that trust yet, maybe all you do is you try one thing, one question, which is, the question could be, how do we measure success? How are we gonna know this is gonna, when this has worked, how are we gonna measure that? And just that one question, it’s not gonna get them all the way to some new way of thinking maybe.

but it’s an initial ask. It’s at least one step beyond overtaking. And then over time, you’ll gain more trust and you’ll be able to sort of expand on that guidance way of thinking about it.

John Jantsch (05:58.144)

You know, what I have found is, is that’s a, that’s an incredible technique in selling. you know, a lot of times people will come to us and say, want this, listen, this. and if, if we have the posture or the courage to back up and say what you said, how will that, how will we know that’s successful? What would success look like? How are we going to measure that? have you considered, I find a lot of times people will put their guard down then and like, we’re going to actually have a conversation about.

Bill Shander (06:04.793)

It is.

John Jantsch (06:26.764)

what we should be doing, I don’t have to pretend I know what to tell you to do. And I find it very disarming in a sales conversation. I mean, not to the level of being obnoxious, you know what I mean? But definitely to the level of saying, let’s think about insights instead of actions.

Bill Shander (06:30.658)

Right.

Bill Shander (06:36.42)

Totally, you’re building trust.

Bill Shander (06:40.9)

Yeah.

Bill Shander (06:45.806)

Yeah, you’re building trust the moment you do that, especially in the sales context when there’s, there’s that built in lack of trust in a way. And on top of that, you know, what, what I found in my career, the only success I’ve had in my career is because I was good at the skills, stakeholder whispering. And, know, part of that is no question. It’s the consultative approach. I’m not here.

to sell you widgets, I’m here to solve your problems. I’m here to actually help you succeed. And when you really honestly are doing that, then that includes, yeah, that asking questions like that, will lead to the right solution, not just a solution that puts dollars in my pocket.

John Jantsch (07:22.552)

So of course you’re implying that you have to actually care about getting them a result, right? Yeah. So we’ve covered one side of it, asking better questions, but what role does actually being a better listener play in this?

Bill Shander (07:26.818)

You do. You have to care and you have to be curious. Those are two things that go sort of hand in hand.

Bill Shander (07:41.848)

Yeah, active listening is something is a phrase people talk about. But do you really listen? know, and you know, what’s interesting is like, here we are, we’re having, of course, and like, you’re an interviewer in this context, and you have to do that, right? And like, when I’m talking to a client, I got to be taking notes, I got to be thinking about my next question, response, or you can’t avoid some some of that. But at the same time,

John Jantsch (07:49.07)

No, I’m thinking about the next question I’m going to ask.

Bill Shander (08:07.61)

What I encourage people to do is as best you can within that reality, you try to really listen. And a friend of mine just recently told me his phrase is, listen with your ears, not your brain. So really hear, and yeah, you’re gonna jot notes, you’re gonna notice a little trigger word, they said X, put a little circle on that, whatever, but don’t start formulating your next question as much as you can avoid it until they stop. Truly listen for that whole time.

John Jantsch (08:18.766)

Mm-hmm.

Bill Shander (08:35.354)

It’s really hard to do. None of us could do it perfectly, but we can strive towards that ideal.

John Jantsch (08:41.132)

I think it’s a little bit cultural too. think, you know, Americans are just like, we need noise. They’re like silence, you know, just kills us, right? I read a study the other day that said Americans, I think the average like silence before they become very uncomfortable is three seconds. And in Japan, it is very common for somebody to get asked a question and to literally wait for eight seconds before answering to give it thought and to give it, you know,

Bill Shander (08:50.702)

Yeah.

Bill Shander (09:04.536)

Wow.

John Jantsch (09:08.486)

emotion and I thought, you know, that’s probably I mean, most people if I sat here for eight seconds of dead air, people were like, what’s wrong? It’s pretty interesting. Yeah. Yeah.

Bill Shander (09:16.495)

Yeah.

So I have a chapter called Silence is Golden. And not only do I talk about that, but even the chapter, the book is put on the pages in a way that each page is just one sentence with silence all around it. Because it is that important, but it is uncomfortable, it’s true.

John Jantsch (09:29.42)

Yeah. Funny. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I’ve taken I’ve do some public speaking and I’ve taken some training on that and frequently a coach or something will say no let that pause let that sit let the audience digest that boy when you’re up on stage it’s like can I do it. It’s really hard. It’s funny. So so what are the

Bill Shander (09:55.186)

It is, but yeah, good, Go ahead. No, I was just gonna say, yeah, that strategic performance, which includes pauses, silence, pacing. I can speak really quickly and I can slow it down. And that has an effect on your audience for sure. Whether it’s an audience of one stakeholder or a room full of people.

John Jantsch (09:59.084)

Go ahead and finish, sir.

John Jantsch (10:15.278)

Right. So what are, let’s go with the negative. What are the common mistakes that people make? They might get the essence of this book and then charge in. What are some of the things that you see are pitfalls?

Bill Shander (10:28.312)

I mean, you one of the biggest problems people face is that they think that their job is to do what their boss tells them to do. And like on paper, there’s some truth to that, but, clients, not just bosses, clients, investors, whoever your stakeholders are, there’s a broad range of them. Obviously your job is to execute on tasks for your organization, but it’s not just to be that order taker that we talked about. So you have to, the most important thing I’m hoping people remember after reading the book.

is that they just need to do this. Like, see the world in a new way. Your job is not to execute those tasks your boss tells you to do. Your job is to succeed and help your organization succeed. And that includes probing. know, just asking, is this the right thing to be doing? Is this the right way to be doing that thing? So, step number one, acknowledge that this is a thing and just try to do something about it.

Another challenge is that some people are less whisperable than others, right? Some bosses are not so even into having these long conversations, like, you know, just do what I said, right? And obviously that takes confidence to push back and really engage your stakeholders, which also of course takes trust like we talked about. And I would say one of the third things is that, you know, it’s challenging for

John Jantsch (11:33.614)

you

Bill Shander (11:53.004)

ourselves, just sort of acknowledge to ourselves that, you know, essentially we’re all walking around being driven by our subconscious. We’re like literally all of our lives is driven by our subconscious. Tons of research shows us that we’re not very good at reasoning. We’re not really very good at deliberative thinking. We’re just being driven by our subconscious. And so if we can just think about ways to tap into the subconscious, yes, even in work, it’s like therapy, then we’re all going to do a better job doing what we need to do for.

ourselves and our organizations. And it is for ourselves also, like you’re going to be promoted if you’re the one who actually challenges the status quo, brings strategic thinking to the table and delivers against that. know duct tape marketing, the basic idea, right, is be strategic, don’t just execute on tasks, right? And so it’s a very similar way of thinking.

John Jantsch (12:40.782)

So I’m curious, have you ever considered children to be stakeholders that we have to whisper to? As I heard you say that, just do what I said. was like, that’s probably not the most current way of thinking about parenting, it?

Bill Shander (12:46.382)

They certainly could be. Yeah. I mean, and that’s

Bill Shander (12:58.264)

Yeah. And actually brings up the fourth really important thing to be thinking about and a risk, you know, a problem with this is that we don’t recognize, acknowledge, define, and prioritize all of the stakeholders. Right? So my boss tells me to do something, I do it. I am thinking my one stakeholder is my boss. No.

Your boss asked you to do that because his boss asked him and his boss, her boss. And so it’s four chains deep. And by the way, the board of directors is going to show this to their investors. Like the stakeholder list is actually this long. And now you can’t worry about all of them, but which ones are the two or the three whose opinions and actual goals really matter the most. Really zoom in on those ones and really make sure you understand their actual needs.

Like if it’s ultimately about the investors, even though your boss has you do it, they’re the real stakeholder. So make sure you understand what they really need and make sure your boss understands that they’re his stakeholder. And so that they’re involved in that stakeholder whispering with them.

John Jantsch (14:01.176)

So that brings up an interesting quant. How do you balance the fact that the objective might be to create a better experience for the customer? However, what my boss is doing, my objective has to be to keep my job. And so now I’m kind of torn between that. This isn’t really the right approach for that stakeholder. But if I want to meet this objective, how do you balance that?

Bill Shander (14:26.49)

Yeah, it’s the million dollar question. It’s hard one, right? So like some bosses, some people are not going to be very whisperable. And yeah, you could jeopardize your job with that person theoretically. I would say long term, most of the time, if you serve the customer, you’re not going to jeopardize your job.

John Jantsch (14:31.598)

Yeah.

Bill Shander (14:47.884)

and everything’s going to be for the better. Like you’re going to be the one who gets promoted. You’re going to take your boss’s job, right? Essentially, because you’re going to really solve problems. Should. Occasionally it won’t. And you either are willing to face that risk for the potential reward and or if your boss isn’t whisperable, guess what? I say, find a new boss, right? Because that’s really honestly the answer. You don’t want to work in a culture like that.

John Jantsch (14:52.782)

should work that way, right. Yeah.

John Jantsch (15:07.362)

me. Right.

John Jantsch (15:13.09)

Like so many, I would put this book into a leadership category. Hopefully that jives a little bit with what you’re thinking. And it seems like most leadership ideas really start with the culture of the organization.

Bill Shander (15:22.51)

Yeah, definitely.

Bill Shander (15:29.166)

They definitely do. Yeah. And I have a chapter at the end, which is called some love for my stakeholders or some love for the stakeholders. And I talk about the fact is first of all, I do, I love my stakeholders and it’s not just like blowing smoke. I’ve really enjoyed the work that I’ve done for the last 30 plus years. I’ve enjoyed working with the vast majority of my clients and I really, am curious and I do care and I want to help them. And so.

When I think, when I talk to them in the book, I say, first of all, thank you for teaching me for all these years how to do what I do. But then I also do turn the page a little bit on them and say, okay, now you may be reading this because you’re a middle manager. Guess what? You’re somebody else’s boss, aren’t you? Also, you are somebody’s stakeholder today, even though you’re thinking of as the order taker. So how whisperable are you? And so companies need to develop the culture where they create.

know, cultures of whisperability. And I have some clients who have amazing cultures where they, listen to me, they listen to their employees. It’s not about hierarchy or anything else. And I’ve worked for, you know, as a vendor for some companies that were really not whisperable at all. And I didn’t work for them for, for very long for a variety of reasons, but it’s really hard to be in that type of environment.

John Jantsch (16:45.262)

You have a chapter about, I mean, so many people are working either hybrid or remote or does that change kind of the framework at all or the structure or does it just add kind of another layer of complexity?

Bill Shander (17:01.978)

think it adds another layer complexity for sure because communications is harder, right? Like right now, I’m not looking at you, I’m looking at my camera, but the viewer is looking at my eyes. So at least there’s some eye contact it feels like happening. And so, you know, when it’s all on Zoom, it’s harder to have that real, really productive conversation, certainly better, you know, the body language and all kinds of other things disappear. So there’s definitely that added complexity.

But the process is still the same. You’ve got to have conversations. You’ve got to ask good questions. And something we didn’t talk about, but there’s a key part to the question asking, which is when I ask my stakeholders questions, I’m not doing it to learn the answers. It’s actually the other way around. It’s more of a Socratic dialogue. I’m asking them questions so that they can learn the answers. I want them to figure out what they actually need from me. I’m not trying to guide them. I’m not trying to tell them. I want them to figure it out. It’s like therapy.

John Jantsch (17:44.483)

Yes.

Bill Shander (17:58.848)

Once they figure it out, then I’ll do that. And so the question asking is a very, it’s a two-way street for sure, but the goal is really to help them learn as much as to help me learn.

John Jantsch (18:11.406)

Yeah, you you call it therapy, but it really strikes me. It’s a lot like coaching in some ways. mean, you’re almost coaching people to think about things that maybe haven’t even considered. know, one of my favorite phrases or least favorite phrases is, that’s the way we’ve always done it. Or that’s the way everybody in our industry does it. And, you know, just to even say, anybody ask why? So we’ve always done it that way. It’s amazing how often people will go, you know, I don’t know.

Bill Shander (18:16.591)

Yeah.

Bill Shander (18:28.515)

Right.

Yeah.

Bill Shander (18:36.697)

you

Bill Shander (18:41.55)

Yeah, it’s true.

John Jantsch (18:41.586)

the answer to that. So do you have any in the book or anything you want to anybody you’ve worked with clients that you’ve worked with kind of a real story or example where you know stakeholder whispering has really led to a far better outcome.

Bill Shander (18:58.99)

Yeah, I I tell one story in the book and it’s funny on the surface. It’s a really boring story. It’s not the most dynamic anecdote in the history of the world at all, but it’s one of the most, the moment when this happened was like really eyeopening for me. so was working on project. was doing this data dashboard essentially for this client and we’re having this conversation about whether we should show the rank position.

of countries on this one metric being measured. So this country is number one, two, three, four, five, or should we show the actual score they got on this measurement? So let’s imagine it’s about web analytics. Should we show the number of clicks they got or just the ranking in terms of clicks? And their argument was the way this type of data usually works, the way it’s always been done, is we always just show the rank because people care if their country ahead or behind their favorite country that they want to compete against. But the scores…

John Jantsch (19:37.526)

Thank

Bill Shander (19:55.364)

were universally really, really high. Very few countries had a low score. So you might’ve been ranked 150th. That looks terrible, that sounds awful. But guess what? You had a super high score, just like everybody else. Only a few countries were actually bad. And so was trying to make the case that maybe we should show the actual score because the fact that this country was ranked low didn’t mean they had an actual problem. And so the data…

John Jantsch (20:17.184)

Yeah, they could close 50 places pretty easily.

Bill Shander (20:20.886)

Exactly. They could close it easily and it didn’t matter where they were anyways, as long as they were above X score. And so, you know, I’m asking all these questions. We’re having this really long debate and she almost convinced me five times. I almost convinced her five times. But the point was, you know, it was a very open ended conversation, mostly each of us asking each other questions. and in the end, you know, there was this one moment where she said just literally, she said the word something to the effect of, I never saw it that way before.

John Jantsch (20:24.59)

Yeah.

Bill Shander (20:50.446)

You’re right. And it wasn’t gratifying because I was right, although that’s nice, you know, but it was really because there was this moment of just incredible open-mindedness to your point. Like, why have we always done it that way? Who the hell knows? Like, well, why should we do it that way? Maybe we should consider, maybe we won’t change it, but maybe we should at least look at doing it this other way. And even that I consider a win.

John Jantsch (20:50.819)

Thanks.

John Jantsch (21:15.222)

Yeah, awesome. Well, Bill, I appreciate you taking a few moments to stop by the show. You want to invite people to connect with you somewhere, find out more about your work, obviously find out more about stakeholder risk.

Bill Shander (21:26.136)

Yeah, you can always find me on my website, BillShander.com. And I’m always happy to connect with people on LinkedIn as well.

John Jantsch (21:32.3)

Well again, I appreciate you stopping by. Hopefully we’ll see you one of these days out there on the road.

Bill Shander (21:36.794)

Thank you very much, John. Nice talking to you.

powered by

Helping Stakeholders Help Themselves

Helping Stakeholders Help Themselves written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

Listen to the full episode: Overview In this episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast, John Jantsch talks with Bill Shander, information designer, data communications expert, and founder of Beehive Media. Bill shares insights from his new book, “Stakeholder Whispering: Uncover What People Need Before Doing What They Ask.” The conversation covers how to turn […]

Helping Stakeholders Help Themselves written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

Listen to the full episode:

Overview

In this episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast, John Jantsch talks with Bill Shander, information designer, data communications expert, and founder of Beehive Media. Bill shares insights from his new book, “Stakeholder Whispering: Uncover What People Need Before Doing What They Ask.” The conversation covers how to turn complex data into clear, actionable stories, the importance of questioning order-taking, and why active listening and genuine curiosity are the keys to building trust and delivering what stakeholders truly need. Listeners will learn practical strategies for stakeholder engagement, leadership, and data-driven decision-making in the age of AI.

About the Guest

Bill Shander is a data communications expert, information designer, and founder of Beehive Media. With over 25 years of experience, he has helped leading organizations—including the United Nations, World Bank, and Deloitte—turn complex ideas into clear, actionable stories. Bill is a recognized thought leader in data visualization, storytelling, and stakeholder engagement, and is the author of “Stakeholder Whispering: Uncover What People Need Before Doing What They Ask.”

Actionable Insights

  • Data storytelling is about communicating meaning and insight, not just sharing numbers and reports.
  • Order-taking leads to missed opportunities; real value comes from questioning, listening, and guiding stakeholders to what they truly need.
  • Active listening, curiosity, and asking better questions are essential for building trust and uncovering stakeholders’ real objectives.
  • Silence is a powerful tool for reflection and better conversation—embrace the pause to allow deeper thinking.
  • Stakeholder engagement applies to all roles, not just marketing—including HR, IT, and leadership.
  • Recognize and prioritize all stakeholders—sometimes the real goals and needs come from several layers up in the organization.
  • In hybrid and remote work environments, intentional communication and Socratic questioning are even more important.
  • Organizational culture and leadership openness determine how effective “stakeholder whispering” can be—seek or build a culture that values questioning and strategic thinking.

Great Moments (with Timestamps)

  • 00:45 – What is a Data Communication Expert?
    Bill explains the importance of storytelling and visualization in making data meaningful.
  • 01:44 – Why Stakeholder Whispering Matters More Than Ever
    Why questioning and guiding stakeholders is critical in the age of AI and short attention spans.
  • 04:28 – Beyond Order-Taking: Leading with Questions
    Bill shares why challenging requests and using a consultative approach delivers better results.
  • 07:41 – The Power of Active Listening and Curiosity
    Tips for asking better questions and truly hearing stakeholders’ needs.
  • 09:16 – Silence is Golden
    The value of pausing, reflection, and pacing in communication and presentations.
  • 10:28 – Common Pitfalls: Mistaking Tasks for Outcomes
    Why focusing only on what’s requested misses the real goals.
  • 12:58 – Recognizing the Real Stakeholders
    How to identify and prioritize who really matters in any project or initiative.
  • 15:13 – Culture, Leadership, and Whisperability
    The role of culture and leadership in fostering open, strategic conversations.
  • 17:01 – Adapting Stakeholder Engagement to Hybrid and Remote Work
    Why face-to-face or Socratic dialogue is essential for discovering true needs.
  • 18:58 – Real-World Example: The Power of Questioning Assumptions
    Bill tells a client story where open-ended questioning led to a far better outcome.

Pulled Quotes

“Our job is not just to execute tasks—it’s to succeed and help our organization succeed. That means probing, questioning, and challenging the status quo.”
— Bill Shander

“Active listening, curiosity, and asking the right questions are what build trust and uncover what stakeholders really need.”
— Bill Shander

John Jantsch (00:00.878)

Hello and welcome to another episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast. This is John Jantsch and my guest today is Bill Shander. He’s a data communications expert, information designer and founder of Beehive Media. Over 25 years of experience, Bill has helped leading organizations, including United Nations, World Bank and Deloitte turn complex ideas into clear, actionable stories. We’re going to talk about his latest book today, Stakeholder Whispering, Uncover What People Need.

before doing what they ask. So Bill, welcome to the show.

Bill Shander (00:34.34)

Thank you, John. I’m really happy to be here.

John Jantsch (00:36.736)

So I just, sometimes people have things in their bios that I have to ask about. So what does a data communication expert do?

Bill Shander (00:45.654)

That’s a good question. So, you know, everybody these days has data, whether it’s your sales data, your marketing data, your HR data, everybody has data. We’re always packaging it up in PowerPoint presentations to present to our bosses or reports for the board or whoever. And people don’t really do a very good job of it either because they’re not really thinking about communicating ideas. They’re worried about shoving numbers at people. And so I help people.

John Jantsch (01:09.314)

Yeah. Right.

Bill Shander (01:12.216)

tell stories of data, as well as visualize that data in an impactful way.

John Jantsch (01:16.462)

Yeah. And I think there’s probably a lot of people, myself included, that I want to hear the story. Like, what does this data mean? you know, rather than just saying, look, we got this much traffic. Okay. Is that good? Is that bad? Yeah. So what inspired you to write the book? I mean, is there, is there something going on today, you know, in the business world that you think it makes this idea more critical?

Bill Shander (01:22.553)

Yeah.

Bill Shander (01:29.014)

Exactly. How many clicks is good? Are clicks even useful? We don’t know.

Bill Shander (01:44.378)

That’s a good question. I don’t know if today it’s more critical in that this has always been an issue, honestly. I’ve been looking at it for 30 years and took me a long time to realize that this is the thing. Like I’ve been thinking about doing a book for a long time and this was finally the idea of the nugget that said, yes, this must be done. It’s been an issue that’s been around forever. Is it more important today than ever? I would say maybe possibly because of AI. mean, okay, we’re already talking about AI, know, it’s 2025, of course you have to, but.

Honestly, when you ask AI to do something, it just does it. AI is an order taker. And we as humans, what can we do better than AI today? Maybe we can still discern, what really should be done? And maybe we can ask good follow-up questions on all the kinds of things that I talk about in the book that we have to do in order to make sure we’re delivering against the right tasks. AI is just going to do it. So it’s even more important for that reason.

John Jantsch (02:19.064)

Yeah. Yeah.

John Jantsch (02:38.198)

Yeah. You know, it’s interesting. mean, I think you can make a case for being more important today and in some ways, because what you mentioned AI actually allows us to crunch a lot more data than we ever would have been able to in some cases. so we certainly have that even the smallest of companies have access now to big crunching. But I think also, I noticed a lot of people, stakeholders included, you know, have much shorter attention spans. And so,

Bill Shander (02:57.082)

Yeah.

John Jantsch (03:04.258)

You know, that 27 page PowerPoint deck, you know, can be condensed into a story or a metaphor. You know, that might actually be a better way to present the information.

Bill Shander (03:15.748)

Well, that’s it. so stakeholder whispering is, you the basic idea is your stakeholders ask you to do things based on their automated response. How do we usually do it? Well, usually we put it to 27 page PowerPoint deck together. And the problem is to what you said, you know, first of all, attention spans are shrinking a hundred other reasons why that may not be the best solution. But on top of that, like,

I mean, they don’t even know what they need. They’re just going to go with the automated response. And so our job as workers, and it doesn’t matter what role you’re in, if it’s marketing, great, but HR people need this, IT people, finance, et cetera. Whatever we’re working on, we need to question the ask, know, question that automated response. Maybe it is a PowerPoint deck that’s needed, or maybe not to your point.

John Jantsch (04:03.928)

So you mentioned the word order taking, know, I actually, ironically, somebody just said this to me the other day. We have to, you know, we have to sell them what they want so that we can get the trust to sell them what they need. You’ve probably heard that before and you’re kind of advocating for the idea that, no, we need to lead them to what they need and not, you know, and maybe use numbers to help do that. Talk a little more about that idea of beyond order taking.

Bill Shander (04:15.502)

Yeah. Yeah.

Bill Shander (04:28.738)

Yeah. And what you just said is also true, right? Like you do have to gain trust before you can lead them effectively. But yes, the fact is our stakeholders don’t know what they need and our job is to guide them. I often say it’s like therapy. I have a whole chapter in the book about how to conduct a therapy session because it is very much like therapy. Someone comes to a therapist because they have an issue and they need help. And the therapist doesn’t tell them what to do.

They ask them questions. say, well, how does that make you feel? Right? And the questions, right. And the questions allow you to look inside yourself and say, wait, yeah. How does that make me feel? And so in work, okay, you know, we’re launching a new product marketing, make us a brochure. Okay. You know, why would a brochure be better than an app or better than this, that, or the other? Huh? Yeah. Maybe, maybe we should do an app. that introspective opportunity is what guides us down the road towards maybe another option.

John Jantsch (04:56.406)

Yeah. Why do we want that?

Bill Shander (05:24.634)

you know, when you’re new, like you’re in a new role, new boss, whatever, you haven’t gained that trust yet, maybe all you do is you try one thing, one question, which is, the question could be, how do we measure success? How are we gonna know this is gonna, when this has worked, how are we gonna measure that? And just that one question, it’s not gonna get them all the way to some new way of thinking maybe.

but it’s an initial ask. It’s at least one step beyond overtaking. And then over time, you’ll gain more trust and you’ll be able to sort of expand on that guidance way of thinking about it.

John Jantsch (05:58.144)

You know, what I have found is, is that’s a, that’s an incredible technique in selling. you know, a lot of times people will come to us and say, want this, listen, this. and if, if we have the posture or the courage to back up and say what you said, how will that, how will we know that’s successful? What would success look like? How are we going to measure that? have you considered, I find a lot of times people will put their guard down then and like, we’re going to actually have a conversation about.

Bill Shander (06:04.793)

It is.

John Jantsch (06:26.764)

what we should be doing, I don’t have to pretend I know what to tell you to do. And I find it very disarming in a sales conversation. I mean, not to the level of being obnoxious, you know what I mean? But definitely to the level of saying, let’s think about insights instead of actions.

Bill Shander (06:30.658)

Right.

Bill Shander (06:36.42)

Totally, you’re building trust.

Bill Shander (06:40.9)

Yeah.

Bill Shander (06:45.806)

Yeah, you’re building trust the moment you do that, especially in the sales context when there’s, there’s that built in lack of trust in a way. And on top of that, you know, what, what I found in my career, the only success I’ve had in my career is because I was good at the skills, stakeholder whispering. And, know, part of that is no question. It’s the consultative approach. I’m not here.

to sell you widgets, I’m here to solve your problems. I’m here to actually help you succeed. And when you really honestly are doing that, then that includes, yeah, that asking questions like that, will lead to the right solution, not just a solution that puts dollars in my pocket.

John Jantsch (07:22.552)

So of course you’re implying that you have to actually care about getting them a result, right? Yeah. So we’ve covered one side of it, asking better questions, but what role does actually being a better listener play in this?

Bill Shander (07:26.818)

You do. You have to care and you have to be curious. Those are two things that go sort of hand in hand.

Bill Shander (07:41.848)

Yeah, active listening is something is a phrase people talk about. But do you really listen? know, and you know, what’s interesting is like, here we are, we’re having, of course, and like, you’re an interviewer in this context, and you have to do that, right? And like, when I’m talking to a client, I got to be taking notes, I got to be thinking about my next question, response, or you can’t avoid some some of that. But at the same time,

John Jantsch (07:49.07)

No, I’m thinking about the next question I’m going to ask.

Bill Shander (08:07.61)

What I encourage people to do is as best you can within that reality, you try to really listen. And a friend of mine just recently told me his phrase is, listen with your ears, not your brain. So really hear, and yeah, you’re gonna jot notes, you’re gonna notice a little trigger word, they said X, put a little circle on that, whatever, but don’t start formulating your next question as much as you can avoid it until they stop. Truly listen for that whole time.

John Jantsch (08:18.766)

Mm-hmm.

Bill Shander (08:35.354)

It’s really hard to do. None of us could do it perfectly, but we can strive towards that ideal.

John Jantsch (08:41.132)

I think it’s a little bit cultural too. think, you know, Americans are just like, we need noise. They’re like silence, you know, just kills us, right? I read a study the other day that said Americans, I think the average like silence before they become very uncomfortable is three seconds. And in Japan, it is very common for somebody to get asked a question and to literally wait for eight seconds before answering to give it thought and to give it, you know,

Bill Shander (08:50.702)

Yeah.

Bill Shander (09:04.536)

Wow.

John Jantsch (09:08.486)

emotion and I thought, you know, that’s probably I mean, most people if I sat here for eight seconds of dead air, people were like, what’s wrong? It’s pretty interesting. Yeah. Yeah.

Bill Shander (09:16.495)

Yeah.

So I have a chapter called Silence is Golden. And not only do I talk about that, but even the chapter, the book is put on the pages in a way that each page is just one sentence with silence all around it. Because it is that important, but it is uncomfortable, it’s true.

John Jantsch (09:29.42)

Yeah. Funny. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I’ve taken I’ve do some public speaking and I’ve taken some training on that and frequently a coach or something will say no let that pause let that sit let the audience digest that boy when you’re up on stage it’s like can I do it. It’s really hard. It’s funny. So so what are the

Bill Shander (09:55.186)

It is, but yeah, good, Go ahead. No, I was just gonna say, yeah, that strategic performance, which includes pauses, silence, pacing. I can speak really quickly and I can slow it down. And that has an effect on your audience for sure. Whether it’s an audience of one stakeholder or a room full of people.

John Jantsch (09:59.084)

Go ahead and finish, sir.

John Jantsch (10:15.278)

Right. So what are, let’s go with the negative. What are the common mistakes that people make? They might get the essence of this book and then charge in. What are some of the things that you see are pitfalls?

Bill Shander (10:28.312)

I mean, you one of the biggest problems people face is that they think that their job is to do what their boss tells them to do. And like on paper, there’s some truth to that, but, clients, not just bosses, clients, investors, whoever your stakeholders are, there’s a broad range of them. Obviously your job is to execute on tasks for your organization, but it’s not just to be that order taker that we talked about. So you have to, the most important thing I’m hoping people remember after reading the book.

is that they just need to do this. Like, see the world in a new way. Your job is not to execute those tasks your boss tells you to do. Your job is to succeed and help your organization succeed. And that includes probing. know, just asking, is this the right thing to be doing? Is this the right way to be doing that thing? So, step number one, acknowledge that this is a thing and just try to do something about it.

Another challenge is that some people are less whisperable than others, right? Some bosses are not so even into having these long conversations, like, you know, just do what I said, right? And obviously that takes confidence to push back and really engage your stakeholders, which also of course takes trust like we talked about. And I would say one of the third things is that, you know, it’s challenging for

John Jantsch (11:33.614)

you

Bill Shander (11:53.004)

ourselves, just sort of acknowledge to ourselves that, you know, essentially we’re all walking around being driven by our subconscious. We’re like literally all of our lives is driven by our subconscious. Tons of research shows us that we’re not very good at reasoning. We’re not really very good at deliberative thinking. We’re just being driven by our subconscious. And so if we can just think about ways to tap into the subconscious, yes, even in work, it’s like therapy, then we’re all going to do a better job doing what we need to do for.

ourselves and our organizations. And it is for ourselves also, like you’re going to be promoted if you’re the one who actually challenges the status quo, brings strategic thinking to the table and delivers against that. know duct tape marketing, the basic idea, right, is be strategic, don’t just execute on tasks, right? And so it’s a very similar way of thinking.

John Jantsch (12:40.782)

So I’m curious, have you ever considered children to be stakeholders that we have to whisper to? As I heard you say that, just do what I said. was like, that’s probably not the most current way of thinking about parenting, it?

Bill Shander (12:46.382)

They certainly could be. Yeah. I mean, and that’s

Bill Shander (12:58.264)

Yeah. And actually brings up the fourth really important thing to be thinking about and a risk, you know, a problem with this is that we don’t recognize, acknowledge, define, and prioritize all of the stakeholders. Right? So my boss tells me to do something, I do it. I am thinking my one stakeholder is my boss. No.

Your boss asked you to do that because his boss asked him and his boss, her boss. And so it’s four chains deep. And by the way, the board of directors is going to show this to their investors. Like the stakeholder list is actually this long. And now you can’t worry about all of them, but which ones are the two or the three whose opinions and actual goals really matter the most. Really zoom in on those ones and really make sure you understand their actual needs.

Like if it’s ultimately about the investors, even though your boss has you do it, they’re the real stakeholder. So make sure you understand what they really need and make sure your boss understands that they’re his stakeholder. And so that they’re involved in that stakeholder whispering with them.

John Jantsch (14:01.176)

So that brings up an interesting quant. How do you balance the fact that the objective might be to create a better experience for the customer? However, what my boss is doing, my objective has to be to keep my job. And so now I’m kind of torn between that. This isn’t really the right approach for that stakeholder. But if I want to meet this objective, how do you balance that?

Bill Shander (14:26.49)

Yeah, it’s the million dollar question. It’s hard one, right? So like some bosses, some people are not going to be very whisperable. And yeah, you could jeopardize your job with that person theoretically. I would say long term, most of the time, if you serve the customer, you’re not going to jeopardize your job.

John Jantsch (14:31.598)

Yeah.

Bill Shander (14:47.884)

and everything’s going to be for the better. Like you’re going to be the one who gets promoted. You’re going to take your boss’s job, right? Essentially, because you’re going to really solve problems. Should. Occasionally it won’t. And you either are willing to face that risk for the potential reward and or if your boss isn’t whisperable, guess what? I say, find a new boss, right? Because that’s really honestly the answer. You don’t want to work in a culture like that.

John Jantsch (14:52.782)

should work that way, right. Yeah.

John Jantsch (15:07.362)

me. Right.

John Jantsch (15:13.09)

Like so many, I would put this book into a leadership category. Hopefully that jives a little bit with what you’re thinking. And it seems like most leadership ideas really start with the culture of the organization.

Bill Shander (15:22.51)

Yeah, definitely.

Bill Shander (15:29.166)

They definitely do. Yeah. And I have a chapter at the end, which is called some love for my stakeholders or some love for the stakeholders. And I talk about the fact is first of all, I do, I love my stakeholders and it’s not just like blowing smoke. I’ve really enjoyed the work that I’ve done for the last 30 plus years. I’ve enjoyed working with the vast majority of my clients and I really, am curious and I do care and I want to help them. And so.

When I think, when I talk to them in the book, I say, first of all, thank you for teaching me for all these years how to do what I do. But then I also do turn the page a little bit on them and say, okay, now you may be reading this because you’re a middle manager. Guess what? You’re somebody else’s boss, aren’t you? Also, you are somebody’s stakeholder today, even though you’re thinking of as the order taker. So how whisperable are you? And so companies need to develop the culture where they create.

know, cultures of whisperability. And I have some clients who have amazing cultures where they, listen to me, they listen to their employees. It’s not about hierarchy or anything else. And I’ve worked for, you know, as a vendor for some companies that were really not whisperable at all. And I didn’t work for them for, for very long for a variety of reasons, but it’s really hard to be in that type of environment.

John Jantsch (16:45.262)

You have a chapter about, I mean, so many people are working either hybrid or remote or does that change kind of the framework at all or the structure or does it just add kind of another layer of complexity?

Bill Shander (17:01.978)

think it adds another layer complexity for sure because communications is harder, right? Like right now, I’m not looking at you, I’m looking at my camera, but the viewer is looking at my eyes. So at least there’s some eye contact it feels like happening. And so, you know, when it’s all on Zoom, it’s harder to have that real, really productive conversation, certainly better, you know, the body language and all kinds of other things disappear. So there’s definitely that added complexity.

But the process is still the same. You’ve got to have conversations. You’ve got to ask good questions. And something we didn’t talk about, but there’s a key part to the question asking, which is when I ask my stakeholders questions, I’m not doing it to learn the answers. It’s actually the other way around. It’s more of a Socratic dialogue. I’m asking them questions so that they can learn the answers. I want them to figure out what they actually need from me. I’m not trying to guide them. I’m not trying to tell them. I want them to figure it out. It’s like therapy.

John Jantsch (17:44.483)

Yes.

Bill Shander (17:58.848)

Once they figure it out, then I’ll do that. And so the question asking is a very, it’s a two-way street for sure, but the goal is really to help them learn as much as to help me learn.

John Jantsch (18:11.406)

Yeah, you you call it therapy, but it really strikes me. It’s a lot like coaching in some ways. mean, you’re almost coaching people to think about things that maybe haven’t even considered. know, one of my favorite phrases or least favorite phrases is, that’s the way we’ve always done it. Or that’s the way everybody in our industry does it. And, you know, just to even say, anybody ask why? So we’ve always done it that way. It’s amazing how often people will go, you know, I don’t know.

Bill Shander (18:16.591)

Yeah.

Bill Shander (18:28.515)

Right.

Yeah.

Bill Shander (18:36.697)

you

Bill Shander (18:41.55)

Yeah, it’s true.

John Jantsch (18:41.586)

the answer to that. So do you have any in the book or anything you want to anybody you’ve worked with clients that you’ve worked with kind of a real story or example where you know stakeholder whispering has really led to a far better outcome.

Bill Shander (18:58.99)

Yeah, I I tell one story in the book and it’s funny on the surface. It’s a really boring story. It’s not the most dynamic anecdote in the history of the world at all, but it’s one of the most, the moment when this happened was like really eyeopening for me. so was working on project. was doing this data dashboard essentially for this client and we’re having this conversation about whether we should show the rank position.

of countries on this one metric being measured. So this country is number one, two, three, four, five, or should we show the actual score they got on this measurement? So let’s imagine it’s about web analytics. Should we show the number of clicks they got or just the ranking in terms of clicks? And their argument was the way this type of data usually works, the way it’s always been done, is we always just show the rank because people care if their country ahead or behind their favorite country that they want to compete against. But the scores…

John Jantsch (19:37.526)

Thank

Bill Shander (19:55.364)

were universally really, really high. Very few countries had a low score. So you might’ve been ranked 150th. That looks terrible, that sounds awful. But guess what? You had a super high score, just like everybody else. Only a few countries were actually bad. And so was trying to make the case that maybe we should show the actual score because the fact that this country was ranked low didn’t mean they had an actual problem. And so the data…

John Jantsch (20:17.184)

Yeah, they could close 50 places pretty easily.

Bill Shander (20:20.886)

Exactly. They could close it easily and it didn’t matter where they were anyways, as long as they were above X score. And so, you know, I’m asking all these questions. We’re having this really long debate and she almost convinced me five times. I almost convinced her five times. But the point was, you know, it was a very open ended conversation, mostly each of us asking each other questions. and in the end, you know, there was this one moment where she said just literally, she said the word something to the effect of, I never saw it that way before.

John Jantsch (20:24.59)

Yeah.

Bill Shander (20:50.446)

You’re right. And it wasn’t gratifying because I was right, although that’s nice, you know, but it was really because there was this moment of just incredible open-mindedness to your point. Like, why have we always done it that way? Who the hell knows? Like, well, why should we do it that way? Maybe we should consider, maybe we won’t change it, but maybe we should at least look at doing it this other way. And even that I consider a win.

John Jantsch (20:50.819)

Thanks.

John Jantsch (21:15.222)

Yeah, awesome. Well, Bill, I appreciate you taking a few moments to stop by the show. You want to invite people to connect with you somewhere, find out more about your work, obviously find out more about stakeholder risk.

Bill Shander (21:26.136)

Yeah, you can always find me on my website, BillShander.com. And I’m always happy to connect with people on LinkedIn as well.

John Jantsch (21:32.3)

Well again, I appreciate you stopping by. Hopefully we’ll see you one of these days out there on the road.

Bill Shander (21:36.794)

Thank you very much, John. Nice talking to you.

powered by

Stranger Things Season 5 Trailer Reveals Why This Show Takes So Damn Long to Make

The biggest threat on Netflix’s global hit Stranger Things isn’t the Demogorgon, Mind Flayer, nor Vecna – it’s the Gregorian calendar. That last time we caught up with the haunted denizens of Hawkins, Indiana was in Stranger Things season 4, released to Netflix in July 2022. Given the accelerated nature of time in the internet […]

The post Stranger Things Season 5 Trailer Reveals Why This Show Takes So Damn Long to Make appeared first on Den of Geek.

Every time a new season of a big tentpole science fiction rolls around, fans and critics tend to try to find the reason why this time things are different. New seasons often proclaim a new cast member or a shake-up behind the scenes in the creative team will change everything. But despite the two-year wait, the refreshing thing about Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 3 is that it’s essentially the same show it’s been since 2022. For the cast and showrunners of the mega-popular Paramount+ series, the edict for season 3 is very clear: If ain’t broken, don’t bring in Scotty to fix it.

“I think it’s the consistency of keeping it a different story, a different genre. Every episode we’re keeping it classic,” star Celia Rose Gooding says. “It’s a strange new world every episode, and I think that’s what keeps fans coming back.”

cnx.cmd.push(function() {
cnx({
playerId: “106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530”,

}).render(“0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796”);
});

But what kinds of strange new worlds can fans expect in a third season? And is the secret to this show’s success only found in its throwback vibes or is there something deeper? In addition to Gooding, we also talked to cast members Anson Mount, Carol Kane, Ethan Peck, Babs Olusanmokun, and showrunners Akiva Goldsman and Henry Alonso Myers to look ahead at the future of the Final Frontier. 

It’s Been a Long Road 

Although Star Trek: Strange New Worlds seems, in some ways, to be a fairly new series (it launched in 2022), for Anson Mount and Ethan Peck, this mission has been going on for nearly a decade, beginning when they first took on the roles of Captain Pike and Mr. Spock in Star Trek: Discovery Season 2 seven years ago.

“There was a lot of discomfort that sort of turned into comfort over time,” Peck says of playing Spock since 2019. “And there are times when I’m on set and I’m not sure if I’m being Spock enough or if I’m being Ethan. And I’m like, ‘Where’s the line?’ We spend so many hours as these characters, and that line gets a little blurry.”

For Mount, the transformation of Pike—from TOS trivia question to beloved lead in Strange New Worlds—has also been a personal journey. And it’s fused him permanently to Pike.

“For whatever reason, this character is closer to me than a lot of other characters that I have played,” Mount admits. “But I think the whole tone of our show is a bit different [from Discovery]. We decided to bear down on the optimism of Trek and the planet-of-the-week, and in order to get there, Pike had to learn that the journey is the destination.”  

A Strange, New Serialization 

Despite its reputation for harkening back to the style and format of The Original Series, the success of Strange New Worlds isn’t really because it copies the self-contained nature of the classic Star Trek show. Instead like many other modern TV shows, Strange New Worlds does have a serialized style to it. But those arcs aren’t only connected to the science fiction stories. In Strange New Worlds, the serialization is the characters. 

“There are certain kinds of relationship stories you can only tell over time,” co-showrunner Goldsman says. “So when we talk about this serialized character arc competent of the show, we’re doing something The Original Series couldn’t.” 

Goldsman brings up the classic TOS episode “The City on the Edge of Forever” as the ultimate example of not only a great episode of Trek but also how it’s demonstrative of the limits of the classic series. We got to know the TOS cast fairly well from 1966 to 1969, but it’s not like the characters had complete arcs.

“Nothing frustrated me more than Kirk losing Edith Keeler one week and being fine the next week,” Goldsman considers. “But on our show, we actually can talk about relationships having beginnings, middles, and ends. They couldn’t. So they were sort of trapped in stasis in a strange way. But we’re not.”

One perfect example of how this kind of character evolution unfolds in season 3 is the transformation of Gooding’s take on Nyota Uhura. Thanks to Strange New Worlds’ character-driven episodic arcs, she’s had much more development with her younger Uhura than Nichelle Nichols ever had on The Original Series, to say nothing of Zoe Saldaña’s Uhura in the reboot movies. As iconic as the two previous Uhuras are, Gooding’s is the one we’ve gotten to know the best. In fact, the journey of her humble Uhura in seasons 1 and 2 will start to fully morph into the more ebullient Uhura of The Original Series during the forthcoming season 3.

“I think with season 3, we’re now getting an opportunity to show her more playful, flirtatious side,” Gooding says. “In the previous seasons, she was a character with so much depth and history and trauma. Now we get to see how she can still find lightness, joy, and playfulness. It’s very reminiscent of the Lieutenant Uhura we see in TOS. That’s a change from what we’ve seen of her in previous seasons.”

On the other side of the Starfleet biographical coin is Dr. M’Benga as played by Babs Olusanmokun. A minor character who appeared in just two TOS episodes (as played by Booker Bradshaw), Olusanmokun’s take on the man has been one of pure invention rather than reinvention. When it comes to M’Benga, canon hardly matters. The character was basically a blank slate. So while he started out as a sympathetic doctor with a mysterious past in Strange New Worlds’ first season, in season 2, we discovered a more physical, action-adventure version of M’Benga, a trend that Olusanmokun ensures will continue in season 3.

“’There are other pieces of him that we’re still unraveling,” Olusanmokun says. “But, yes, we leaned into that for season 2 and there’s more of that in season 3.” 

For those who remember Olusanmokun in both Dune: Part One and Dune: Part Two, where he played the Fremen Jamis, the actor has the ability to bring equal parts warrior and monk to certain roles, something that is on full display for M’Benga in Strange New Worlds Season 3. But, is this character the most dangerous doctor in Star Trek history? Could this badass take Dr. Bashir or Bones in a fight? Olusanmokun hints at a connection between himself and the quiet strength of M’Benga, saying only, “Those that know what they do don’t talk about what they do, or glorify what they do. They just do it.”

Keeping Things Light 

Despite the franchise’s reputation for self-seriousness and social commentary about the nature of humanity, the Star Trek phenomenon would be nothing without humor. And it’s here that Strange New Worlds Season 3 excels: it brings the fun to the Final Frontier without completely turning the show into a full-on sitcom (although one episode this season might qualify as a rom-com!). But this humorous element couldn’t work without certain characters. Hence in the second season, the producers enlisted the legendary Carol Kane to join the crew as the semi-immortal Pelia, a chief engineer with the irascibility of Bones and a sweetness that is all her own.

And no, we haven’t confused her with singer Carol King. “They thought I wrote the Tapestry album,” Kane jokes. “This is the first time I’m breaking it to them. Do you still love me?”

One thing that is new for Kane in season 3 is her pairing with Pelia’s old student, Montgomery Scott, better known to legions of fans as Scotty. Played by Martin Quinn in the season 2 finale, Scotty is back in season 3 as a full member of the cast.

“Oh, I love him. He is just adorable. He’s so fun,” Kane gushes. She also says that she feels that her character benefits from the company of the rest of the crew, something that comes across both in real life and on the screen.

“I was very moved by how I was accepted just right off the bat,” the performer explains. “My first scene was with Ethan who just accepted me. My instinct is to just try and dive into the writing and fulfill it as much with commitment and energy as I can, and that’s how she came out. I think they wrote a lovely character for me and I am very grateful.”

There’s also an episode this season directed by Jonathan Frakes, which Peck, Gooding, and Mount all say is “very funny.” Gooding also reveals that some bits in that forthcoming episode were teased out by Frakes. “Whenever Jonathan Frakes gets on set as a director, I feel so much more liberty to try new stuff and do fun things… it’s really, really fun.”

Mount agrees, saying with a sly smile: “Jonathan loves to be on set because he’s a fucking actor.” But relative to the process of comedy, Mount says the environment of the Strange New Worlds set often encourages humorous creativity. Sometimes on the fly. “Comedy happens when you find it,” he says. “And so you’re constantly kind of changing things just for the sake of seeing if you can find something new.”

Beyond the Five-Year Mission 

Every episode of Strange New Worlds begins with Captain Pike echoing the familiar words of Captain Kirk, telling us that this is a “five-year mission” of the USS Enterprise. Just before we sat down with the cast and creative team of the show, it was revealed that this time limit is somewhat literal. Like two other contemporary Paramount+ Trek shows—Discovery and Lower DecksStrange New Worlds will conclude after its fifth season, likely released sometime in 2027. And while this suggests a kind of endpoint for the series, there are still three whole seasons of the show that fans haven’t seen yet.

“I don’t feel like we’re doing the same thing each season,” co-showrunner Henry Alonso Myers says. “Without getting into specifics, there are some things in season 4 that people do that we have not seen those characters do. Every day is like that.”

Both Myers and Goldsman insist that the season 3—and season 4 and season 5—of Strange New Worlds will continue to deliver on what the promise of the series was originally; to make a version of The Original Series that could exist in today’s culture. But because Strange New Worlds uses classic characters who have been around for nearly 60 years, Goldsman agrees that on some level, the show is a bit like the various novels and comics based on the TOS cast, some of which satiated fans’ hunger when there was zero Star Trek on TV back in the 1970s and early 1980s. This isn’t fan fiction, exactly, but rather, a kind of expanded universe of The Original Series, previously only found in books and comics.

“It’s a good comparison, thinking about the books. I’ve never thought of it, but that’s very much what we are,” Goldsman says. “We’re behind the canon. We’re beyond what is apparent.” 

So, outside of the next three years of Strange New Worlds adventures, what’s next? Could Strange New Worlds morph into a reboot of The Original Series, at least for a little while? Goldsman isn’t saying yes, but he’s not saying no either.

“Our plan, our aspiration has always been to get to TOS,” he says. “The plan was that we would have five years to move from the Strange New Worlds cast and crew to a TOS show. Whether we do or don’t, that’s the hope.”

Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 3 debuts with two episodes on Paramount+ on July 17.

The post Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Really Is the Funnest Crew in the Fleet appeared first on Den of Geek.

The Legend of Zelda Movie Has Found Its Hero and Princess

The Hero of Time has arrived, and he’s not anyone that we expected. Via social media, Nintendo‘s legendary game designer Shigeru Miyamoto announced the leads for the upcoming live action adaptation of The Legend of Zelda. “I am pleased to announce that for the live action film of ‘The Legend of Zelda,’ Zelda will be […]

The post The Legend of Zelda Movie Has Found Its Hero and Princess appeared first on Den of Geek.

Every time a new season of a big tentpole science fiction rolls around, fans and critics tend to try to find the reason why this time things are different. New seasons often proclaim a new cast member or a shake-up behind the scenes in the creative team will change everything. But despite the two-year wait, the refreshing thing about Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 3 is that it’s essentially the same show it’s been since 2022. For the cast and showrunners of the mega-popular Paramount+ series, the edict for season 3 is very clear: If ain’t broken, don’t bring in Scotty to fix it.

“I think it’s the consistency of keeping it a different story, a different genre. Every episode we’re keeping it classic,” star Celia Rose Gooding says. “It’s a strange new world every episode, and I think that’s what keeps fans coming back.”

cnx.cmd.push(function() {
cnx({
playerId: “106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530”,

}).render(“0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796”);
});

But what kinds of strange new worlds can fans expect in a third season? And is the secret to this show’s success only found in its throwback vibes or is there something deeper? In addition to Gooding, we also talked to cast members Anson Mount, Carol Kane, Ethan Peck, Babs Olusanmokun, and showrunners Akiva Goldsman and Henry Alonso Myers to look ahead at the future of the Final Frontier. 

It’s Been a Long Road 

Although Star Trek: Strange New Worlds seems, in some ways, to be a fairly new series (it launched in 2022), for Anson Mount and Ethan Peck, this mission has been going on for nearly a decade, beginning when they first took on the roles of Captain Pike and Mr. Spock in Star Trek: Discovery Season 2 seven years ago.

“There was a lot of discomfort that sort of turned into comfort over time,” Peck says of playing Spock since 2019. “And there are times when I’m on set and I’m not sure if I’m being Spock enough or if I’m being Ethan. And I’m like, ‘Where’s the line?’ We spend so many hours as these characters, and that line gets a little blurry.”

For Mount, the transformation of Pike—from TOS trivia question to beloved lead in Strange New Worlds—has also been a personal journey. And it’s fused him permanently to Pike.

“For whatever reason, this character is closer to me than a lot of other characters that I have played,” Mount admits. “But I think the whole tone of our show is a bit different [from Discovery]. We decided to bear down on the optimism of Trek and the planet-of-the-week, and in order to get there, Pike had to learn that the journey is the destination.”  

A Strange, New Serialization 

Despite its reputation for harkening back to the style and format of The Original Series, the success of Strange New Worlds isn’t really because it copies the self-contained nature of the classic Star Trek show. Instead like many other modern TV shows, Strange New Worlds does have a serialized style to it. But those arcs aren’t only connected to the science fiction stories. In Strange New Worlds, the serialization is the characters. 

“There are certain kinds of relationship stories you can only tell over time,” co-showrunner Goldsman says. “So when we talk about this serialized character arc competent of the show, we’re doing something The Original Series couldn’t.” 

Goldsman brings up the classic TOS episode “The City on the Edge of Forever” as the ultimate example of not only a great episode of Trek but also how it’s demonstrative of the limits of the classic series. We got to know the TOS cast fairly well from 1966 to 1969, but it’s not like the characters had complete arcs.

“Nothing frustrated me more than Kirk losing Edith Keeler one week and being fine the next week,” Goldsman considers. “But on our show, we actually can talk about relationships having beginnings, middles, and ends. They couldn’t. So they were sort of trapped in stasis in a strange way. But we’re not.”

One perfect example of how this kind of character evolution unfolds in season 3 is the transformation of Gooding’s take on Nyota Uhura. Thanks to Strange New Worlds’ character-driven episodic arcs, she’s had much more development with her younger Uhura than Nichelle Nichols ever had on The Original Series, to say nothing of Zoe Saldaña’s Uhura in the reboot movies. As iconic as the two previous Uhuras are, Gooding’s is the one we’ve gotten to know the best. In fact, the journey of her humble Uhura in seasons 1 and 2 will start to fully morph into the more ebullient Uhura of The Original Series during the forthcoming season 3.

“I think with season 3, we’re now getting an opportunity to show her more playful, flirtatious side,” Gooding says. “In the previous seasons, she was a character with so much depth and history and trauma. Now we get to see how she can still find lightness, joy, and playfulness. It’s very reminiscent of the Lieutenant Uhura we see in TOS. That’s a change from what we’ve seen of her in previous seasons.”

On the other side of the Starfleet biographical coin is Dr. M’Benga as played by Babs Olusanmokun. A minor character who appeared in just two TOS episodes (as played by Booker Bradshaw), Olusanmokun’s take on the man has been one of pure invention rather than reinvention. When it comes to M’Benga, canon hardly matters. The character was basically a blank slate. So while he started out as a sympathetic doctor with a mysterious past in Strange New Worlds’ first season, in season 2, we discovered a more physical, action-adventure version of M’Benga, a trend that Olusanmokun ensures will continue in season 3.

“’There are other pieces of him that we’re still unraveling,” Olusanmokun says. “But, yes, we leaned into that for season 2 and there’s more of that in season 3.” 

For those who remember Olusanmokun in both Dune: Part One and Dune: Part Two, where he played the Fremen Jamis, the actor has the ability to bring equal parts warrior and monk to certain roles, something that is on full display for M’Benga in Strange New Worlds Season 3. But, is this character the most dangerous doctor in Star Trek history? Could this badass take Dr. Bashir or Bones in a fight? Olusanmokun hints at a connection between himself and the quiet strength of M’Benga, saying only, “Those that know what they do don’t talk about what they do, or glorify what they do. They just do it.”

Keeping Things Light 

Despite the franchise’s reputation for self-seriousness and social commentary about the nature of humanity, the Star Trek phenomenon would be nothing without humor. And it’s here that Strange New Worlds Season 3 excels: it brings the fun to the Final Frontier without completely turning the show into a full-on sitcom (although one episode this season might qualify as a rom-com!). But this humorous element couldn’t work without certain characters. Hence in the second season, the producers enlisted the legendary Carol Kane to join the crew as the semi-immortal Pelia, a chief engineer with the irascibility of Bones and a sweetness that is all her own.

And no, we haven’t confused her with singer Carol King. “They thought I wrote the Tapestry album,” Kane jokes. “This is the first time I’m breaking it to them. Do you still love me?”

One thing that is new for Kane in season 3 is her pairing with Pelia’s old student, Montgomery Scott, better known to legions of fans as Scotty. Played by Martin Quinn in the season 2 finale, Scotty is back in season 3 as a full member of the cast.

“Oh, I love him. He is just adorable. He’s so fun,” Kane gushes. She also says that she feels that her character benefits from the company of the rest of the crew, something that comes across both in real life and on the screen.

“I was very moved by how I was accepted just right off the bat,” the performer explains. “My first scene was with Ethan who just accepted me. My instinct is to just try and dive into the writing and fulfill it as much with commitment and energy as I can, and that’s how she came out. I think they wrote a lovely character for me and I am very grateful.”

There’s also an episode this season directed by Jonathan Frakes, which Peck, Gooding, and Mount all say is “very funny.” Gooding also reveals that some bits in that forthcoming episode were teased out by Frakes. “Whenever Jonathan Frakes gets on set as a director, I feel so much more liberty to try new stuff and do fun things… it’s really, really fun.”

Mount agrees, saying with a sly smile: “Jonathan loves to be on set because he’s a fucking actor.” But relative to the process of comedy, Mount says the environment of the Strange New Worlds set often encourages humorous creativity. Sometimes on the fly. “Comedy happens when you find it,” he says. “And so you’re constantly kind of changing things just for the sake of seeing if you can find something new.”

Beyond the Five-Year Mission 

Every episode of Strange New Worlds begins with Captain Pike echoing the familiar words of Captain Kirk, telling us that this is a “five-year mission” of the USS Enterprise. Just before we sat down with the cast and creative team of the show, it was revealed that this time limit is somewhat literal. Like two other contemporary Paramount+ Trek shows—Discovery and Lower DecksStrange New Worlds will conclude after its fifth season, likely released sometime in 2027. And while this suggests a kind of endpoint for the series, there are still three whole seasons of the show that fans haven’t seen yet.

“I don’t feel like we’re doing the same thing each season,” co-showrunner Henry Alonso Myers says. “Without getting into specifics, there are some things in season 4 that people do that we have not seen those characters do. Every day is like that.”

Both Myers and Goldsman insist that the season 3—and season 4 and season 5—of Strange New Worlds will continue to deliver on what the promise of the series was originally; to make a version of The Original Series that could exist in today’s culture. But because Strange New Worlds uses classic characters who have been around for nearly 60 years, Goldsman agrees that on some level, the show is a bit like the various novels and comics based on the TOS cast, some of which satiated fans’ hunger when there was zero Star Trek on TV back in the 1970s and early 1980s. This isn’t fan fiction, exactly, but rather, a kind of expanded universe of The Original Series, previously only found in books and comics.

“It’s a good comparison, thinking about the books. I’ve never thought of it, but that’s very much what we are,” Goldsman says. “We’re behind the canon. We’re beyond what is apparent.” 

So, outside of the next three years of Strange New Worlds adventures, what’s next? Could Strange New Worlds morph into a reboot of The Original Series, at least for a little while? Goldsman isn’t saying yes, but he’s not saying no either.

“Our plan, our aspiration has always been to get to TOS,” he says. “The plan was that we would have five years to move from the Strange New Worlds cast and crew to a TOS show. Whether we do or don’t, that’s the hope.”

Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 3 debuts with two episodes on Paramount+ on July 17.

The post Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Really Is the Funnest Crew in the Fleet appeared first on Den of Geek.

New Jurassic World Rebirth Video Puts Stake in Heart of Dinosaur Cloning

Move over Mr. DNA, because Colossal Biosciences is here to offer an old-fashioned bit of exposition about “that scary de-extinction word and set the record straight.” That’s right, the company which made headlines this year with stories about bringing back dire wolves (or at least a version of them) and creating woolly mice, has partnered […]

The post New Jurassic World Rebirth Video Puts Stake in Heart of Dinosaur Cloning appeared first on Den of Geek.

Every time a new season of a big tentpole science fiction rolls around, fans and critics tend to try to find the reason why this time things are different. New seasons often proclaim a new cast member or a shake-up behind the scenes in the creative team will change everything. But despite the two-year wait, the refreshing thing about Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 3 is that it’s essentially the same show it’s been since 2022. For the cast and showrunners of the mega-popular Paramount+ series, the edict for season 3 is very clear: If ain’t broken, don’t bring in Scotty to fix it.

“I think it’s the consistency of keeping it a different story, a different genre. Every episode we’re keeping it classic,” star Celia Rose Gooding says. “It’s a strange new world every episode, and I think that’s what keeps fans coming back.”

cnx.cmd.push(function() {
cnx({
playerId: “106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530”,

}).render(“0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796”);
});

But what kinds of strange new worlds can fans expect in a third season? And is the secret to this show’s success only found in its throwback vibes or is there something deeper? In addition to Gooding, we also talked to cast members Anson Mount, Carol Kane, Ethan Peck, Babs Olusanmokun, and showrunners Akiva Goldsman and Henry Alonso Myers to look ahead at the future of the Final Frontier. 

It’s Been a Long Road 

Although Star Trek: Strange New Worlds seems, in some ways, to be a fairly new series (it launched in 2022), for Anson Mount and Ethan Peck, this mission has been going on for nearly a decade, beginning when they first took on the roles of Captain Pike and Mr. Spock in Star Trek: Discovery Season 2 seven years ago.

“There was a lot of discomfort that sort of turned into comfort over time,” Peck says of playing Spock since 2019. “And there are times when I’m on set and I’m not sure if I’m being Spock enough or if I’m being Ethan. And I’m like, ‘Where’s the line?’ We spend so many hours as these characters, and that line gets a little blurry.”

For Mount, the transformation of Pike—from TOS trivia question to beloved lead in Strange New Worlds—has also been a personal journey. And it’s fused him permanently to Pike.

“For whatever reason, this character is closer to me than a lot of other characters that I have played,” Mount admits. “But I think the whole tone of our show is a bit different [from Discovery]. We decided to bear down on the optimism of Trek and the planet-of-the-week, and in order to get there, Pike had to learn that the journey is the destination.”  

A Strange, New Serialization 

Despite its reputation for harkening back to the style and format of The Original Series, the success of Strange New Worlds isn’t really because it copies the self-contained nature of the classic Star Trek show. Instead like many other modern TV shows, Strange New Worlds does have a serialized style to it. But those arcs aren’t only connected to the science fiction stories. In Strange New Worlds, the serialization is the characters. 

“There are certain kinds of relationship stories you can only tell over time,” co-showrunner Goldsman says. “So when we talk about this serialized character arc competent of the show, we’re doing something The Original Series couldn’t.” 

Goldsman brings up the classic TOS episode “The City on the Edge of Forever” as the ultimate example of not only a great episode of Trek but also how it’s demonstrative of the limits of the classic series. We got to know the TOS cast fairly well from 1966 to 1969, but it’s not like the characters had complete arcs.

“Nothing frustrated me more than Kirk losing Edith Keeler one week and being fine the next week,” Goldsman considers. “But on our show, we actually can talk about relationships having beginnings, middles, and ends. They couldn’t. So they were sort of trapped in stasis in a strange way. But we’re not.”

One perfect example of how this kind of character evolution unfolds in season 3 is the transformation of Gooding’s take on Nyota Uhura. Thanks to Strange New Worlds’ character-driven episodic arcs, she’s had much more development with her younger Uhura than Nichelle Nichols ever had on The Original Series, to say nothing of Zoe Saldaña’s Uhura in the reboot movies. As iconic as the two previous Uhuras are, Gooding’s is the one we’ve gotten to know the best. In fact, the journey of her humble Uhura in seasons 1 and 2 will start to fully morph into the more ebullient Uhura of The Original Series during the forthcoming season 3.

“I think with season 3, we’re now getting an opportunity to show her more playful, flirtatious side,” Gooding says. “In the previous seasons, she was a character with so much depth and history and trauma. Now we get to see how she can still find lightness, joy, and playfulness. It’s very reminiscent of the Lieutenant Uhura we see in TOS. That’s a change from what we’ve seen of her in previous seasons.”

On the other side of the Starfleet biographical coin is Dr. M’Benga as played by Babs Olusanmokun. A minor character who appeared in just two TOS episodes (as played by Booker Bradshaw), Olusanmokun’s take on the man has been one of pure invention rather than reinvention. When it comes to M’Benga, canon hardly matters. The character was basically a blank slate. So while he started out as a sympathetic doctor with a mysterious past in Strange New Worlds’ first season, in season 2, we discovered a more physical, action-adventure version of M’Benga, a trend that Olusanmokun ensures will continue in season 3.

“’There are other pieces of him that we’re still unraveling,” Olusanmokun says. “But, yes, we leaned into that for season 2 and there’s more of that in season 3.” 

For those who remember Olusanmokun in both Dune: Part One and Dune: Part Two, where he played the Fremen Jamis, the actor has the ability to bring equal parts warrior and monk to certain roles, something that is on full display for M’Benga in Strange New Worlds Season 3. But, is this character the most dangerous doctor in Star Trek history? Could this badass take Dr. Bashir or Bones in a fight? Olusanmokun hints at a connection between himself and the quiet strength of M’Benga, saying only, “Those that know what they do don’t talk about what they do, or glorify what they do. They just do it.”

Keeping Things Light 

Despite the franchise’s reputation for self-seriousness and social commentary about the nature of humanity, the Star Trek phenomenon would be nothing without humor. And it’s here that Strange New Worlds Season 3 excels: it brings the fun to the Final Frontier without completely turning the show into a full-on sitcom (although one episode this season might qualify as a rom-com!). But this humorous element couldn’t work without certain characters. Hence in the second season, the producers enlisted the legendary Carol Kane to join the crew as the semi-immortal Pelia, a chief engineer with the irascibility of Bones and a sweetness that is all her own.

And no, we haven’t confused her with singer Carol King. “They thought I wrote the Tapestry album,” Kane jokes. “This is the first time I’m breaking it to them. Do you still love me?”

One thing that is new for Kane in season 3 is her pairing with Pelia’s old student, Montgomery Scott, better known to legions of fans as Scotty. Played by Martin Quinn in the season 2 finale, Scotty is back in season 3 as a full member of the cast.

“Oh, I love him. He is just adorable. He’s so fun,” Kane gushes. She also says that she feels that her character benefits from the company of the rest of the crew, something that comes across both in real life and on the screen.

“I was very moved by how I was accepted just right off the bat,” the performer explains. “My first scene was with Ethan who just accepted me. My instinct is to just try and dive into the writing and fulfill it as much with commitment and energy as I can, and that’s how she came out. I think they wrote a lovely character for me and I am very grateful.”

There’s also an episode this season directed by Jonathan Frakes, which Peck, Gooding, and Mount all say is “very funny.” Gooding also reveals that some bits in that forthcoming episode were teased out by Frakes. “Whenever Jonathan Frakes gets on set as a director, I feel so much more liberty to try new stuff and do fun things… it’s really, really fun.”

Mount agrees, saying with a sly smile: “Jonathan loves to be on set because he’s a fucking actor.” But relative to the process of comedy, Mount says the environment of the Strange New Worlds set often encourages humorous creativity. Sometimes on the fly. “Comedy happens when you find it,” he says. “And so you’re constantly kind of changing things just for the sake of seeing if you can find something new.”

Beyond the Five-Year Mission 

Every episode of Strange New Worlds begins with Captain Pike echoing the familiar words of Captain Kirk, telling us that this is a “five-year mission” of the USS Enterprise. Just before we sat down with the cast and creative team of the show, it was revealed that this time limit is somewhat literal. Like two other contemporary Paramount+ Trek shows—Discovery and Lower DecksStrange New Worlds will conclude after its fifth season, likely released sometime in 2027. And while this suggests a kind of endpoint for the series, there are still three whole seasons of the show that fans haven’t seen yet.

“I don’t feel like we’re doing the same thing each season,” co-showrunner Henry Alonso Myers says. “Without getting into specifics, there are some things in season 4 that people do that we have not seen those characters do. Every day is like that.”

Both Myers and Goldsman insist that the season 3—and season 4 and season 5—of Strange New Worlds will continue to deliver on what the promise of the series was originally; to make a version of The Original Series that could exist in today’s culture. But because Strange New Worlds uses classic characters who have been around for nearly 60 years, Goldsman agrees that on some level, the show is a bit like the various novels and comics based on the TOS cast, some of which satiated fans’ hunger when there was zero Star Trek on TV back in the 1970s and early 1980s. This isn’t fan fiction, exactly, but rather, a kind of expanded universe of The Original Series, previously only found in books and comics.

“It’s a good comparison, thinking about the books. I’ve never thought of it, but that’s very much what we are,” Goldsman says. “We’re behind the canon. We’re beyond what is apparent.” 

So, outside of the next three years of Strange New Worlds adventures, what’s next? Could Strange New Worlds morph into a reboot of The Original Series, at least for a little while? Goldsman isn’t saying yes, but he’s not saying no either.

“Our plan, our aspiration has always been to get to TOS,” he says. “The plan was that we would have five years to move from the Strange New Worlds cast and crew to a TOS show. Whether we do or don’t, that’s the hope.”

Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 3 debuts with two episodes on Paramount+ on July 17.

The post Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Really Is the Funnest Crew in the Fleet appeared first on Den of Geek.

I Know What You Did Last Summer Review: Legacy Sequels Really Need to Get the Hook Now

Out of all the Y2K-era R-rated horrors, it was only a matter of time before I Know What You Did Last Summer handed its hook over to the next generation—now in the shape of the boilerplate legacy sequel movie, as opposed to the short-lived and already forgotten 2021 Prime Video series. Despite the commercial success […]

The post I Know What You Did Last Summer Review: Legacy Sequels Really Need to Get the Hook Now appeared first on Den of Geek.

Every time a new season of a big tentpole science fiction rolls around, fans and critics tend to try to find the reason why this time things are different. New seasons often proclaim a new cast member or a shake-up behind the scenes in the creative team will change everything. But despite the two-year wait, the refreshing thing about Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 3 is that it’s essentially the same show it’s been since 2022. For the cast and showrunners of the mega-popular Paramount+ series, the edict for season 3 is very clear: If ain’t broken, don’t bring in Scotty to fix it.

“I think it’s the consistency of keeping it a different story, a different genre. Every episode we’re keeping it classic,” star Celia Rose Gooding says. “It’s a strange new world every episode, and I think that’s what keeps fans coming back.”

cnx.cmd.push(function() {
cnx({
playerId: “106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530”,

}).render(“0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796”);
});

But what kinds of strange new worlds can fans expect in a third season? And is the secret to this show’s success only found in its throwback vibes or is there something deeper? In addition to Gooding, we also talked to cast members Anson Mount, Carol Kane, Ethan Peck, Babs Olusanmokun, and showrunners Akiva Goldsman and Henry Alonso Myers to look ahead at the future of the Final Frontier. 

It’s Been a Long Road 

Although Star Trek: Strange New Worlds seems, in some ways, to be a fairly new series (it launched in 2022), for Anson Mount and Ethan Peck, this mission has been going on for nearly a decade, beginning when they first took on the roles of Captain Pike and Mr. Spock in Star Trek: Discovery Season 2 seven years ago.

“There was a lot of discomfort that sort of turned into comfort over time,” Peck says of playing Spock since 2019. “And there are times when I’m on set and I’m not sure if I’m being Spock enough or if I’m being Ethan. And I’m like, ‘Where’s the line?’ We spend so many hours as these characters, and that line gets a little blurry.”

For Mount, the transformation of Pike—from TOS trivia question to beloved lead in Strange New Worlds—has also been a personal journey. And it’s fused him permanently to Pike.

“For whatever reason, this character is closer to me than a lot of other characters that I have played,” Mount admits. “But I think the whole tone of our show is a bit different [from Discovery]. We decided to bear down on the optimism of Trek and the planet-of-the-week, and in order to get there, Pike had to learn that the journey is the destination.”  

A Strange, New Serialization 

Despite its reputation for harkening back to the style and format of The Original Series, the success of Strange New Worlds isn’t really because it copies the self-contained nature of the classic Star Trek show. Instead like many other modern TV shows, Strange New Worlds does have a serialized style to it. But those arcs aren’t only connected to the science fiction stories. In Strange New Worlds, the serialization is the characters. 

“There are certain kinds of relationship stories you can only tell over time,” co-showrunner Goldsman says. “So when we talk about this serialized character arc competent of the show, we’re doing something The Original Series couldn’t.” 

Goldsman brings up the classic TOS episode “The City on the Edge of Forever” as the ultimate example of not only a great episode of Trek but also how it’s demonstrative of the limits of the classic series. We got to know the TOS cast fairly well from 1966 to 1969, but it’s not like the characters had complete arcs.

“Nothing frustrated me more than Kirk losing Edith Keeler one week and being fine the next week,” Goldsman considers. “But on our show, we actually can talk about relationships having beginnings, middles, and ends. They couldn’t. So they were sort of trapped in stasis in a strange way. But we’re not.”

One perfect example of how this kind of character evolution unfolds in season 3 is the transformation of Gooding’s take on Nyota Uhura. Thanks to Strange New Worlds’ character-driven episodic arcs, she’s had much more development with her younger Uhura than Nichelle Nichols ever had on The Original Series, to say nothing of Zoe Saldaña’s Uhura in the reboot movies. As iconic as the two previous Uhuras are, Gooding’s is the one we’ve gotten to know the best. In fact, the journey of her humble Uhura in seasons 1 and 2 will start to fully morph into the more ebullient Uhura of The Original Series during the forthcoming season 3.

“I think with season 3, we’re now getting an opportunity to show her more playful, flirtatious side,” Gooding says. “In the previous seasons, she was a character with so much depth and history and trauma. Now we get to see how she can still find lightness, joy, and playfulness. It’s very reminiscent of the Lieutenant Uhura we see in TOS. That’s a change from what we’ve seen of her in previous seasons.”

On the other side of the Starfleet biographical coin is Dr. M’Benga as played by Babs Olusanmokun. A minor character who appeared in just two TOS episodes (as played by Booker Bradshaw), Olusanmokun’s take on the man has been one of pure invention rather than reinvention. When it comes to M’Benga, canon hardly matters. The character was basically a blank slate. So while he started out as a sympathetic doctor with a mysterious past in Strange New Worlds’ first season, in season 2, we discovered a more physical, action-adventure version of M’Benga, a trend that Olusanmokun ensures will continue in season 3.

“’There are other pieces of him that we’re still unraveling,” Olusanmokun says. “But, yes, we leaned into that for season 2 and there’s more of that in season 3.” 

For those who remember Olusanmokun in both Dune: Part One and Dune: Part Two, where he played the Fremen Jamis, the actor has the ability to bring equal parts warrior and monk to certain roles, something that is on full display for M’Benga in Strange New Worlds Season 3. But, is this character the most dangerous doctor in Star Trek history? Could this badass take Dr. Bashir or Bones in a fight? Olusanmokun hints at a connection between himself and the quiet strength of M’Benga, saying only, “Those that know what they do don’t talk about what they do, or glorify what they do. They just do it.”

Keeping Things Light 

Despite the franchise’s reputation for self-seriousness and social commentary about the nature of humanity, the Star Trek phenomenon would be nothing without humor. And it’s here that Strange New Worlds Season 3 excels: it brings the fun to the Final Frontier without completely turning the show into a full-on sitcom (although one episode this season might qualify as a rom-com!). But this humorous element couldn’t work without certain characters. Hence in the second season, the producers enlisted the legendary Carol Kane to join the crew as the semi-immortal Pelia, a chief engineer with the irascibility of Bones and a sweetness that is all her own.

And no, we haven’t confused her with singer Carol King. “They thought I wrote the Tapestry album,” Kane jokes. “This is the first time I’m breaking it to them. Do you still love me?”

One thing that is new for Kane in season 3 is her pairing with Pelia’s old student, Montgomery Scott, better known to legions of fans as Scotty. Played by Martin Quinn in the season 2 finale, Scotty is back in season 3 as a full member of the cast.

“Oh, I love him. He is just adorable. He’s so fun,” Kane gushes. She also says that she feels that her character benefits from the company of the rest of the crew, something that comes across both in real life and on the screen.

“I was very moved by how I was accepted just right off the bat,” the performer explains. “My first scene was with Ethan who just accepted me. My instinct is to just try and dive into the writing and fulfill it as much with commitment and energy as I can, and that’s how she came out. I think they wrote a lovely character for me and I am very grateful.”

There’s also an episode this season directed by Jonathan Frakes, which Peck, Gooding, and Mount all say is “very funny.” Gooding also reveals that some bits in that forthcoming episode were teased out by Frakes. “Whenever Jonathan Frakes gets on set as a director, I feel so much more liberty to try new stuff and do fun things… it’s really, really fun.”

Mount agrees, saying with a sly smile: “Jonathan loves to be on set because he’s a fucking actor.” But relative to the process of comedy, Mount says the environment of the Strange New Worlds set often encourages humorous creativity. Sometimes on the fly. “Comedy happens when you find it,” he says. “And so you’re constantly kind of changing things just for the sake of seeing if you can find something new.”

Beyond the Five-Year Mission 

Every episode of Strange New Worlds begins with Captain Pike echoing the familiar words of Captain Kirk, telling us that this is a “five-year mission” of the USS Enterprise. Just before we sat down with the cast and creative team of the show, it was revealed that this time limit is somewhat literal. Like two other contemporary Paramount+ Trek shows—Discovery and Lower DecksStrange New Worlds will conclude after its fifth season, likely released sometime in 2027. And while this suggests a kind of endpoint for the series, there are still three whole seasons of the show that fans haven’t seen yet.

“I don’t feel like we’re doing the same thing each season,” co-showrunner Henry Alonso Myers says. “Without getting into specifics, there are some things in season 4 that people do that we have not seen those characters do. Every day is like that.”

Both Myers and Goldsman insist that the season 3—and season 4 and season 5—of Strange New Worlds will continue to deliver on what the promise of the series was originally; to make a version of The Original Series that could exist in today’s culture. But because Strange New Worlds uses classic characters who have been around for nearly 60 years, Goldsman agrees that on some level, the show is a bit like the various novels and comics based on the TOS cast, some of which satiated fans’ hunger when there was zero Star Trek on TV back in the 1970s and early 1980s. This isn’t fan fiction, exactly, but rather, a kind of expanded universe of The Original Series, previously only found in books and comics.

“It’s a good comparison, thinking about the books. I’ve never thought of it, but that’s very much what we are,” Goldsman says. “We’re behind the canon. We’re beyond what is apparent.” 

So, outside of the next three years of Strange New Worlds adventures, what’s next? Could Strange New Worlds morph into a reboot of The Original Series, at least for a little while? Goldsman isn’t saying yes, but he’s not saying no either.

“Our plan, our aspiration has always been to get to TOS,” he says. “The plan was that we would have five years to move from the Strange New Worlds cast and crew to a TOS show. Whether we do or don’t, that’s the hope.”

Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 3 debuts with two episodes on Paramount+ on July 17.

The post Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Really Is the Funnest Crew in the Fleet appeared first on Den of Geek.

Stranger Things Is Turning Eleven Into the Franchise’s Superman

David Corenswet might be the superhero of the summer after his starring turn in James Gunn’s new Superman adaptation, but the Stranger Things season 5 trailer has given fans a taste of another powered-up badass who will be saving humanity from alternate-dimensioned evildoers.  Eleven (Millie Bobby Brown) has always been the main attraction in a […]

The post Stranger Things Is Turning Eleven Into the Franchise’s Superman appeared first on Den of Geek.

Every time a new season of a big tentpole science fiction rolls around, fans and critics tend to try to find the reason why this time things are different. New seasons often proclaim a new cast member or a shake-up behind the scenes in the creative team will change everything. But despite the two-year wait, the refreshing thing about Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 3 is that it’s essentially the same show it’s been since 2022. For the cast and showrunners of the mega-popular Paramount+ series, the edict for season 3 is very clear: If ain’t broken, don’t bring in Scotty to fix it.

“I think it’s the consistency of keeping it a different story, a different genre. Every episode we’re keeping it classic,” star Celia Rose Gooding says. “It’s a strange new world every episode, and I think that’s what keeps fans coming back.”

cnx.cmd.push(function() {
cnx({
playerId: “106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530”,

}).render(“0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796”);
});

But what kinds of strange new worlds can fans expect in a third season? And is the secret to this show’s success only found in its throwback vibes or is there something deeper? In addition to Gooding, we also talked to cast members Anson Mount, Carol Kane, Ethan Peck, Babs Olusanmokun, and showrunners Akiva Goldsman and Henry Alonso Myers to look ahead at the future of the Final Frontier. 

It’s Been a Long Road 

Although Star Trek: Strange New Worlds seems, in some ways, to be a fairly new series (it launched in 2022), for Anson Mount and Ethan Peck, this mission has been going on for nearly a decade, beginning when they first took on the roles of Captain Pike and Mr. Spock in Star Trek: Discovery Season 2 seven years ago.

“There was a lot of discomfort that sort of turned into comfort over time,” Peck says of playing Spock since 2019. “And there are times when I’m on set and I’m not sure if I’m being Spock enough or if I’m being Ethan. And I’m like, ‘Where’s the line?’ We spend so many hours as these characters, and that line gets a little blurry.”

For Mount, the transformation of Pike—from TOS trivia question to beloved lead in Strange New Worlds—has also been a personal journey. And it’s fused him permanently to Pike.

“For whatever reason, this character is closer to me than a lot of other characters that I have played,” Mount admits. “But I think the whole tone of our show is a bit different [from Discovery]. We decided to bear down on the optimism of Trek and the planet-of-the-week, and in order to get there, Pike had to learn that the journey is the destination.”  

A Strange, New Serialization 

Despite its reputation for harkening back to the style and format of The Original Series, the success of Strange New Worlds isn’t really because it copies the self-contained nature of the classic Star Trek show. Instead like many other modern TV shows, Strange New Worlds does have a serialized style to it. But those arcs aren’t only connected to the science fiction stories. In Strange New Worlds, the serialization is the characters. 

“There are certain kinds of relationship stories you can only tell over time,” co-showrunner Goldsman says. “So when we talk about this serialized character arc competent of the show, we’re doing something The Original Series couldn’t.” 

Goldsman brings up the classic TOS episode “The City on the Edge of Forever” as the ultimate example of not only a great episode of Trek but also how it’s demonstrative of the limits of the classic series. We got to know the TOS cast fairly well from 1966 to 1969, but it’s not like the characters had complete arcs.

“Nothing frustrated me more than Kirk losing Edith Keeler one week and being fine the next week,” Goldsman considers. “But on our show, we actually can talk about relationships having beginnings, middles, and ends. They couldn’t. So they were sort of trapped in stasis in a strange way. But we’re not.”

One perfect example of how this kind of character evolution unfolds in season 3 is the transformation of Gooding’s take on Nyota Uhura. Thanks to Strange New Worlds’ character-driven episodic arcs, she’s had much more development with her younger Uhura than Nichelle Nichols ever had on The Original Series, to say nothing of Zoe Saldaña’s Uhura in the reboot movies. As iconic as the two previous Uhuras are, Gooding’s is the one we’ve gotten to know the best. In fact, the journey of her humble Uhura in seasons 1 and 2 will start to fully morph into the more ebullient Uhura of The Original Series during the forthcoming season 3.

“I think with season 3, we’re now getting an opportunity to show her more playful, flirtatious side,” Gooding says. “In the previous seasons, she was a character with so much depth and history and trauma. Now we get to see how she can still find lightness, joy, and playfulness. It’s very reminiscent of the Lieutenant Uhura we see in TOS. That’s a change from what we’ve seen of her in previous seasons.”

On the other side of the Starfleet biographical coin is Dr. M’Benga as played by Babs Olusanmokun. A minor character who appeared in just two TOS episodes (as played by Booker Bradshaw), Olusanmokun’s take on the man has been one of pure invention rather than reinvention. When it comes to M’Benga, canon hardly matters. The character was basically a blank slate. So while he started out as a sympathetic doctor with a mysterious past in Strange New Worlds’ first season, in season 2, we discovered a more physical, action-adventure version of M’Benga, a trend that Olusanmokun ensures will continue in season 3.

“’There are other pieces of him that we’re still unraveling,” Olusanmokun says. “But, yes, we leaned into that for season 2 and there’s more of that in season 3.” 

For those who remember Olusanmokun in both Dune: Part One and Dune: Part Two, where he played the Fremen Jamis, the actor has the ability to bring equal parts warrior and monk to certain roles, something that is on full display for M’Benga in Strange New Worlds Season 3. But, is this character the most dangerous doctor in Star Trek history? Could this badass take Dr. Bashir or Bones in a fight? Olusanmokun hints at a connection between himself and the quiet strength of M’Benga, saying only, “Those that know what they do don’t talk about what they do, or glorify what they do. They just do it.”

Keeping Things Light 

Despite the franchise’s reputation for self-seriousness and social commentary about the nature of humanity, the Star Trek phenomenon would be nothing without humor. And it’s here that Strange New Worlds Season 3 excels: it brings the fun to the Final Frontier without completely turning the show into a full-on sitcom (although one episode this season might qualify as a rom-com!). But this humorous element couldn’t work without certain characters. Hence in the second season, the producers enlisted the legendary Carol Kane to join the crew as the semi-immortal Pelia, a chief engineer with the irascibility of Bones and a sweetness that is all her own.

And no, we haven’t confused her with singer Carol King. “They thought I wrote the Tapestry album,” Kane jokes. “This is the first time I’m breaking it to them. Do you still love me?”

One thing that is new for Kane in season 3 is her pairing with Pelia’s old student, Montgomery Scott, better known to legions of fans as Scotty. Played by Martin Quinn in the season 2 finale, Scotty is back in season 3 as a full member of the cast.

“Oh, I love him. He is just adorable. He’s so fun,” Kane gushes. She also says that she feels that her character benefits from the company of the rest of the crew, something that comes across both in real life and on the screen.

“I was very moved by how I was accepted just right off the bat,” the performer explains. “My first scene was with Ethan who just accepted me. My instinct is to just try and dive into the writing and fulfill it as much with commitment and energy as I can, and that’s how she came out. I think they wrote a lovely character for me and I am very grateful.”

There’s also an episode this season directed by Jonathan Frakes, which Peck, Gooding, and Mount all say is “very funny.” Gooding also reveals that some bits in that forthcoming episode were teased out by Frakes. “Whenever Jonathan Frakes gets on set as a director, I feel so much more liberty to try new stuff and do fun things… it’s really, really fun.”

Mount agrees, saying with a sly smile: “Jonathan loves to be on set because he’s a fucking actor.” But relative to the process of comedy, Mount says the environment of the Strange New Worlds set often encourages humorous creativity. Sometimes on the fly. “Comedy happens when you find it,” he says. “And so you’re constantly kind of changing things just for the sake of seeing if you can find something new.”

Beyond the Five-Year Mission 

Every episode of Strange New Worlds begins with Captain Pike echoing the familiar words of Captain Kirk, telling us that this is a “five-year mission” of the USS Enterprise. Just before we sat down with the cast and creative team of the show, it was revealed that this time limit is somewhat literal. Like two other contemporary Paramount+ Trek shows—Discovery and Lower DecksStrange New Worlds will conclude after its fifth season, likely released sometime in 2027. And while this suggests a kind of endpoint for the series, there are still three whole seasons of the show that fans haven’t seen yet.

“I don’t feel like we’re doing the same thing each season,” co-showrunner Henry Alonso Myers says. “Without getting into specifics, there are some things in season 4 that people do that we have not seen those characters do. Every day is like that.”

Both Myers and Goldsman insist that the season 3—and season 4 and season 5—of Strange New Worlds will continue to deliver on what the promise of the series was originally; to make a version of The Original Series that could exist in today’s culture. But because Strange New Worlds uses classic characters who have been around for nearly 60 years, Goldsman agrees that on some level, the show is a bit like the various novels and comics based on the TOS cast, some of which satiated fans’ hunger when there was zero Star Trek on TV back in the 1970s and early 1980s. This isn’t fan fiction, exactly, but rather, a kind of expanded universe of The Original Series, previously only found in books and comics.

“It’s a good comparison, thinking about the books. I’ve never thought of it, but that’s very much what we are,” Goldsman says. “We’re behind the canon. We’re beyond what is apparent.” 

So, outside of the next three years of Strange New Worlds adventures, what’s next? Could Strange New Worlds morph into a reboot of The Original Series, at least for a little while? Goldsman isn’t saying yes, but he’s not saying no either.

“Our plan, our aspiration has always been to get to TOS,” he says. “The plan was that we would have five years to move from the Strange New Worlds cast and crew to a TOS show. Whether we do or don’t, that’s the hope.”

Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 3 debuts with two episodes on Paramount+ on July 17.

The post Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Really Is the Funnest Crew in the Fleet appeared first on Den of Geek.

X-Men: All The Right And Wrong Lessons Hollywood Took from a Superhero Movie 25 Years Ago

It was 25 years ago that X-Men truly launched the modern era of the superhero movie. While there had been films before starring Batman and Superman—and even Blade offered proof that obscure Marvel Comics characters could work at the box office—X-Men’s release in 2000 was a game-changer. It helped pave the way for Sam Raimi’s […]

The post X-Men: All The Right And Wrong Lessons Hollywood Took from a Superhero Movie 25 Years Ago appeared first on Den of Geek.

Every time a new season of a big tentpole science fiction rolls around, fans and critics tend to try to find the reason why this time things are different. New seasons often proclaim a new cast member or a shake-up behind the scenes in the creative team will change everything. But despite the two-year wait, the refreshing thing about Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 3 is that it’s essentially the same show it’s been since 2022. For the cast and showrunners of the mega-popular Paramount+ series, the edict for season 3 is very clear: If ain’t broken, don’t bring in Scotty to fix it.

“I think it’s the consistency of keeping it a different story, a different genre. Every episode we’re keeping it classic,” star Celia Rose Gooding says. “It’s a strange new world every episode, and I think that’s what keeps fans coming back.”

cnx.cmd.push(function() {
cnx({
playerId: “106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530”,

}).render(“0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796”);
});

But what kinds of strange new worlds can fans expect in a third season? And is the secret to this show’s success only found in its throwback vibes or is there something deeper? In addition to Gooding, we also talked to cast members Anson Mount, Carol Kane, Ethan Peck, Babs Olusanmokun, and showrunners Akiva Goldsman and Henry Alonso Myers to look ahead at the future of the Final Frontier. 

It’s Been a Long Road 

Although Star Trek: Strange New Worlds seems, in some ways, to be a fairly new series (it launched in 2022), for Anson Mount and Ethan Peck, this mission has been going on for nearly a decade, beginning when they first took on the roles of Captain Pike and Mr. Spock in Star Trek: Discovery Season 2 seven years ago.

“There was a lot of discomfort that sort of turned into comfort over time,” Peck says of playing Spock since 2019. “And there are times when I’m on set and I’m not sure if I’m being Spock enough or if I’m being Ethan. And I’m like, ‘Where’s the line?’ We spend so many hours as these characters, and that line gets a little blurry.”

For Mount, the transformation of Pike—from TOS trivia question to beloved lead in Strange New Worlds—has also been a personal journey. And it’s fused him permanently to Pike.

“For whatever reason, this character is closer to me than a lot of other characters that I have played,” Mount admits. “But I think the whole tone of our show is a bit different [from Discovery]. We decided to bear down on the optimism of Trek and the planet-of-the-week, and in order to get there, Pike had to learn that the journey is the destination.”  

A Strange, New Serialization 

Despite its reputation for harkening back to the style and format of The Original Series, the success of Strange New Worlds isn’t really because it copies the self-contained nature of the classic Star Trek show. Instead like many other modern TV shows, Strange New Worlds does have a serialized style to it. But those arcs aren’t only connected to the science fiction stories. In Strange New Worlds, the serialization is the characters. 

“There are certain kinds of relationship stories you can only tell over time,” co-showrunner Goldsman says. “So when we talk about this serialized character arc competent of the show, we’re doing something The Original Series couldn’t.” 

Goldsman brings up the classic TOS episode “The City on the Edge of Forever” as the ultimate example of not only a great episode of Trek but also how it’s demonstrative of the limits of the classic series. We got to know the TOS cast fairly well from 1966 to 1969, but it’s not like the characters had complete arcs.

“Nothing frustrated me more than Kirk losing Edith Keeler one week and being fine the next week,” Goldsman considers. “But on our show, we actually can talk about relationships having beginnings, middles, and ends. They couldn’t. So they were sort of trapped in stasis in a strange way. But we’re not.”

One perfect example of how this kind of character evolution unfolds in season 3 is the transformation of Gooding’s take on Nyota Uhura. Thanks to Strange New Worlds’ character-driven episodic arcs, she’s had much more development with her younger Uhura than Nichelle Nichols ever had on The Original Series, to say nothing of Zoe Saldaña’s Uhura in the reboot movies. As iconic as the two previous Uhuras are, Gooding’s is the one we’ve gotten to know the best. In fact, the journey of her humble Uhura in seasons 1 and 2 will start to fully morph into the more ebullient Uhura of The Original Series during the forthcoming season 3.

“I think with season 3, we’re now getting an opportunity to show her more playful, flirtatious side,” Gooding says. “In the previous seasons, she was a character with so much depth and history and trauma. Now we get to see how she can still find lightness, joy, and playfulness. It’s very reminiscent of the Lieutenant Uhura we see in TOS. That’s a change from what we’ve seen of her in previous seasons.”

On the other side of the Starfleet biographical coin is Dr. M’Benga as played by Babs Olusanmokun. A minor character who appeared in just two TOS episodes (as played by Booker Bradshaw), Olusanmokun’s take on the man has been one of pure invention rather than reinvention. When it comes to M’Benga, canon hardly matters. The character was basically a blank slate. So while he started out as a sympathetic doctor with a mysterious past in Strange New Worlds’ first season, in season 2, we discovered a more physical, action-adventure version of M’Benga, a trend that Olusanmokun ensures will continue in season 3.

“’There are other pieces of him that we’re still unraveling,” Olusanmokun says. “But, yes, we leaned into that for season 2 and there’s more of that in season 3.” 

For those who remember Olusanmokun in both Dune: Part One and Dune: Part Two, where he played the Fremen Jamis, the actor has the ability to bring equal parts warrior and monk to certain roles, something that is on full display for M’Benga in Strange New Worlds Season 3. But, is this character the most dangerous doctor in Star Trek history? Could this badass take Dr. Bashir or Bones in a fight? Olusanmokun hints at a connection between himself and the quiet strength of M’Benga, saying only, “Those that know what they do don’t talk about what they do, or glorify what they do. They just do it.”

Keeping Things Light 

Despite the franchise’s reputation for self-seriousness and social commentary about the nature of humanity, the Star Trek phenomenon would be nothing without humor. And it’s here that Strange New Worlds Season 3 excels: it brings the fun to the Final Frontier without completely turning the show into a full-on sitcom (although one episode this season might qualify as a rom-com!). But this humorous element couldn’t work without certain characters. Hence in the second season, the producers enlisted the legendary Carol Kane to join the crew as the semi-immortal Pelia, a chief engineer with the irascibility of Bones and a sweetness that is all her own.

And no, we haven’t confused her with singer Carol King. “They thought I wrote the Tapestry album,” Kane jokes. “This is the first time I’m breaking it to them. Do you still love me?”

One thing that is new for Kane in season 3 is her pairing with Pelia’s old student, Montgomery Scott, better known to legions of fans as Scotty. Played by Martin Quinn in the season 2 finale, Scotty is back in season 3 as a full member of the cast.

“Oh, I love him. He is just adorable. He’s so fun,” Kane gushes. She also says that she feels that her character benefits from the company of the rest of the crew, something that comes across both in real life and on the screen.

“I was very moved by how I was accepted just right off the bat,” the performer explains. “My first scene was with Ethan who just accepted me. My instinct is to just try and dive into the writing and fulfill it as much with commitment and energy as I can, and that’s how she came out. I think they wrote a lovely character for me and I am very grateful.”

There’s also an episode this season directed by Jonathan Frakes, which Peck, Gooding, and Mount all say is “very funny.” Gooding also reveals that some bits in that forthcoming episode were teased out by Frakes. “Whenever Jonathan Frakes gets on set as a director, I feel so much more liberty to try new stuff and do fun things… it’s really, really fun.”

Mount agrees, saying with a sly smile: “Jonathan loves to be on set because he’s a fucking actor.” But relative to the process of comedy, Mount says the environment of the Strange New Worlds set often encourages humorous creativity. Sometimes on the fly. “Comedy happens when you find it,” he says. “And so you’re constantly kind of changing things just for the sake of seeing if you can find something new.”

Beyond the Five-Year Mission 

Every episode of Strange New Worlds begins with Captain Pike echoing the familiar words of Captain Kirk, telling us that this is a “five-year mission” of the USS Enterprise. Just before we sat down with the cast and creative team of the show, it was revealed that this time limit is somewhat literal. Like two other contemporary Paramount+ Trek shows—Discovery and Lower DecksStrange New Worlds will conclude after its fifth season, likely released sometime in 2027. And while this suggests a kind of endpoint for the series, there are still three whole seasons of the show that fans haven’t seen yet.

“I don’t feel like we’re doing the same thing each season,” co-showrunner Henry Alonso Myers says. “Without getting into specifics, there are some things in season 4 that people do that we have not seen those characters do. Every day is like that.”

Both Myers and Goldsman insist that the season 3—and season 4 and season 5—of Strange New Worlds will continue to deliver on what the promise of the series was originally; to make a version of The Original Series that could exist in today’s culture. But because Strange New Worlds uses classic characters who have been around for nearly 60 years, Goldsman agrees that on some level, the show is a bit like the various novels and comics based on the TOS cast, some of which satiated fans’ hunger when there was zero Star Trek on TV back in the 1970s and early 1980s. This isn’t fan fiction, exactly, but rather, a kind of expanded universe of The Original Series, previously only found in books and comics.

“It’s a good comparison, thinking about the books. I’ve never thought of it, but that’s very much what we are,” Goldsman says. “We’re behind the canon. We’re beyond what is apparent.” 

So, outside of the next three years of Strange New Worlds adventures, what’s next? Could Strange New Worlds morph into a reboot of The Original Series, at least for a little while? Goldsman isn’t saying yes, but he’s not saying no either.

“Our plan, our aspiration has always been to get to TOS,” he says. “The plan was that we would have five years to move from the Strange New Worlds cast and crew to a TOS show. Whether we do or don’t, that’s the hope.”

Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Season 3 debuts with two episodes on Paramount+ on July 17.

The post Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Really Is the Funnest Crew in the Fleet appeared first on Den of Geek.